Concept of 'fit' is central to which of the following schools of thought on strategy formulation?
The design school
Strategy formulation is a critical process where an organization defines its direction and makes decisions on allocating its resources to pursue this direction. Over time, various schools of thought have emerged, each offering a different perspective on how strategy should be developed. These schools provide frameworks for understanding the complex process of strategic thinking.
The question asks which school of thought on strategy formulation considers the concept of 'fit' to be central. 'Fit' in strategy refers to the congruence or alignment between an organization's internal capabilities and resources and the opportunities and threats presented by its external environment. It's about ensuring the organization's strategy leverages its strengths to exploit opportunities while mitigating weaknesses against threats.
Let's examine the options provided and their core tenets regarding strategy formulation:
The Design School is fundamentally built around the idea of achieving a state of 'fit'. It proposes that effective strategy arises from a deliberate, thought-out process of matching the organization's unique capabilities with the demands and possibilities of its environment. This involves:
Therefore, the concept of 'fit' is not just one aspect among many for the Design School; it is the very essence of effective strategy formulation according to this perspective.
Based on the analysis, the school of thought that places the concept of 'fit' at its center is the Design School.
| School | Key Idea | Central Concept | Emphasis on 'Fit' |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design School | Strategy as conception | Achieving a match between internal and external factors (SWOT) | Central - the core goal is achieving fit. |
| Positioning School | Strategy as analysis (industry structure) | Competitive positioning within an industry | Relevant, but secondary to industry analysis and positioning. |
| Planning School | Strategy as a formal process | Systematic planning steps and programs | Considered during analysis, but the process is central, not fit itself. |
| Cognitive School | Strategy as a mental process | Cognition, perception, biases of the strategist | Relates to how fit is perceived, but not the central concept. |
The Design School was one of the earliest formal frameworks for strategy formulation, particularly popular in the 1960s and 1970s. While later schools critiqued its simplicity (e.g., assuming a stable environment and a single strategist), its emphasis on the internal-external match (SWOT analysis) remains a foundational concept in strategic management. Many contemporary strategy approaches still incorporate elements of the Design School's focus on achieving alignment or 'fit'. Understanding this school helps appreciate the evolution of strategic thinking and the enduring importance of internal-external congruence.
A copier machine company provides better after sales service to its existing customer to improve its (company) and product image and increase sales of accessories and consumables. Above given statement is an example of:
Match List - I with List - II :
List - I | List - II | ||
a | Goal | i | Basic function or task of an organization |
b | Strategy | ii | End toward which an activity is directed |
c | Mission | iii | Adoption of course of action to achieve long term objective |
d | Rule | iv | Actions or non-actions allowing on discretion |
Choose the correct option from those given below:
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labeled as Reason (R) :
Assertion (A) : The training during direct preparation should have dual aim i.e. to achieve top form along with the removal of deficiencies of the athlete.
Reason (R) : The training should be highly individualized and specific to the expected competition conditions.
In the context of the above two statements, which of the following statement is correct ?