The following Table-1 and Table-2 show the break-up of 4170 vacant posts in six Banks A-F, and the percentage (%) breakup of the requirement of personnel in six different cadres in a Bank, namely. IT officers (ITO), Agricultural Field Officers (AFO), Law Officers (LO), Finance Executives (FE), Technical Officers (TO) and Probationary Officers (PO), respectively.. Assume that these percentages are the same for all the six Banks. Based on the data in the tables, answer the questions. Tables 1: Bank-wise Vacant Posts Bank Number of Vacant Posts A 800 B 940 C 600 D 820 E 450 F 560 Table 2: Cadre-wise Percentage Breakup of Posts Cadre in a Bank Breakup (%) ITO 11% AFO 35% LO 10% FE 26% TO 8% PO 10
Banks D and F hired 15% more POS than their requirement. After one year, the total strength of the staff in both D and F was brought down to the original strength through retrenchment of some employees. By what percent is the retrenchment less/more in Bank D than in Bank F?
46.43% more in Bank D
The problem asks us to find the percentage difference in retrenchment of Probationary Officers (POs) between Bank D and Bank F. We are given the total number of vacant posts in each bank and the percentage breakup of required personnel across different cadres, including POs.
According to Table 2, the percentage breakup for Probationary Officers (PO) cadre is 10% for any bank. This means that 10% of the total vacant posts in a bank are for POs.
From Table 1:
Required POs in Bank D:
\(\text{Required POs in D} = \text{Vacant Posts in D} \times \text{PO Percentage}\)
\(\text{Required POs in D} = 820 \times 10\% = 820 \times \frac{10}{100} = 82\)
Required POs in Bank F:
\(\text{Required POs in F} = \text{Vacant Posts in F} \times \text{PO Percentage}\)
\(\text{Required POs in F} = 560 \times 10\% = 560 \times \frac{10}{100} = 56\)
The problem states that Banks D and F hired 15% more POs than their requirement.
POs hired by Bank D:
\(\text{POs hired by D} = \text{Required POs in D} \times (1 + \text{Extra Percentage})\)
\(\text{POs hired by D} = 82 \times (1 + 15\%) = 82 \times (1 + \frac{15}{100}) = 82 \times 1.15 = 94.3\)
POs hired by Bank F:
\(\text{POs hired by F} = \text{Required POs in F} \times (1 + \text{Extra Percentage})\)
\(\text{POs hired by F} = 56 \times (1 + 15\%) = 56 \times (1 + \frac{15}{100}) = 56 \times 1.15 = 64.4\)
After one year, the staff strength was brought down to the original requirement. The number of retrenchments is the difference between the number of POs hired and the original requirement.
Retrenchment in Bank D:
\(\text{Retrenchment in D} = \text{POs hired by D} - \text{Required POs in D}\)
\(\text{Retrenchment in D} = 94.3 - 82 = 12.3\)
Retrenchment in Bank F:
\(\text{Retrenchment in F} = \text{POs hired by F} - \text{Required POs in F}\)
\(\text{Retrenchment in F} = 64.4 - 56 = 8.4\)
We need to find by what percent the retrenchment in Bank D is less/more than in Bank F. This means we calculate the percentage difference relative to Bank F's retrenchment.
\(\text{Percentage Difference} = \frac{\text{Retrenchment in D} - \text{Retrenchment in F}}{\text{Retrenchment in F}} \times 100\)
\(\text{Percentage Difference} = \frac{12.3 - 8.4}{8.4} \times 100\)
\(\text{Percentage Difference} = \frac{3.9}{8.4} \times 100\)
\(\text{Percentage Difference} \approx 0.4642857 \times 100 \approx 46.43\%\)
Since the retrenchment in Bank D (12.3) is greater than the retrenchment in Bank F (8.4), the retrenchment in Bank D is 46.43% more than in Bank F.
| Bank | Vacant Posts | Required POs (10%) | POs Hired (15% more) | Retrenchment (Hired - Required) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | 820 | 82 | 94.3 | 12.3 |
| F | 560 | 56 | 64.4 | 8.4 |
Comparison:
\(\frac{\text{Retrenchment in D} - \text{Retrenchment in F}}{\text{Retrenchment in F}} \times 100 = \frac{12.3 - 8.4}{8.4} \times 100 \approx 46.43\%\)
Retrenchment in D is more than in F.
Therefore, the retrenchment is approximately 46.43% more in Bank D than in Bank F.
| Concept | Description | Formula/Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Required Staff | Number of posts needed in a specific cadre based on total vacancies and cadre percentage. | Total Vacancies × Cadre Percentage |
| Staff Hired (with increase) | Number of staff recruited, often exceeding the requirement by a certain percentage. | Required Staff × (1 + Percentage Increase) |
| Retrenchment | Number of staff laid off to reduce strength back to the required level. | Staff Hired - Required Staff |
| Percentage Difference | Comparing two values as a percentage of one of the values (the base). | \(\frac{\text{Value 1} - \text{Value 2}}{\text{Value 2}} \times 100\) (If Value 1 > Value 2, it's 'more'; if Value 1 < Value 2, it's 'less') |
Data Interpretation (DI) questions, like this one involving bank vacant posts and cadre breakups, are common in banking and other competitive exams. They test your ability to read, analyze, and interpret data presented in tables, charts, or graphs to answer specific questions.
Mastering these skills is crucial for efficiently solving DI problems and scoring well in competitive examinations.
The table shows District-wise data of a number of primary school teachers posted in schools of a city.
Study the table and answer the question:
District | Male teachers | Female teachers |
East | 1650 | 2375 |
North | 1075 | 2651 |
West | 1280 | 1520 |
South | 1170 | 1085 |
Central | 690 | 859 |
Table shows income (in Rs. ) received by 4 employees of a company during the month of December 2020 and all their income sources.
Source | Amit | Suresh | Nitin | Varun |
Salary | 35000 | 38500 | 29000 | 42000 |
Arrears | 6000 | 6300 | 5000 | 7500 |
Bonus | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 1240 |
Overtime | 1800 | 1950 | 1400 | 1500 |
Study the table and answer the question:
Income (Rs.) | No. of persons |
Less than 200 | 12 |
Less than 250 | 26 |
Less than 300 | 34 |
Less than 350 | 40 |
Less than 400 | 50 |
The following table shows the annual profit of a company (in Rs. lakh).
2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2016-0217 | 2017-2018 | 2018-2019 |
625 | 690 | 725 | 775 | 815 |
The period which has the maximum percentage increase in profit over the previous year is:
The table given below shows the number of persons participating in a survey from 6 different states.
| States | Persons |
| S1 | 100 |
| S2 | 200 |
| S3 | 400 |
| S4 | 500 |
| S5 | 600 |
| S6 | 800 |
What is the ratio of number of person participating in a survey from state S3 to the number of person participating in a survey from state S4?