As per Henry Mintsberg, which of the following is NOT a part of his conception of types of strategies?
Contingency Strategy
The question asks us to identify which of the listed options is NOT a part of Henry Mintzberg's well-known conception of the types of strategies. Mintzberg's work significantly contributed to how we understand the process of strategy formation in organizations. He argued that strategy isn't just a purely rational, planned process but also emerges from actions and decisions over time.
Henry Mintzberg views strategy formation as a complex process, often contrasting the idea of 'deliberate' strategy (what was intended) with 'emergent' strategy (what actually happens). His framework helps explain why organizational strategies might look different in practice compared to initial plans. Key types of strategies in his framework include:
Let's examine each option in the context of Mintzberg's framework:
Based on Mintzberg's well-known framework comparing planned (intended/deliberate) and unplanned (emergent) strategies and how they lead to realized strategy, 'Contingency Strategy' is not one of the primary types he uses to describe the fundamental ways strategies form or fail to form.
Mintzberg's framework contrasts intended, deliberate, unrealised, and emergent strategies to explain the realised strategy. A contingency strategy is a specific type of plan for uncertain events, not a fundamental type of strategy formation within his core model.
| Concept | Description | Part of Mintzberg's Core Framework? |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Strategy | Planned, desired course of action by management. | Yes |
| Deliberate Strategy | Intended strategy that is successfully implemented. | Yes (a type of realised strategy) |
| Unrealised Strategy | Intended strategy that is not implemented. | Yes |
| Emergent Strategy | Strategy that develops unexpectedly from actions/decisions. | Yes |
| Realised Strategy | What the organization actually does; mix of deliberate and emergent. | Yes |
| Contingency Strategy | Plan for specific uncertain future events. | No (generally considered a type of planning, not a fundamental strategy formation type in his model) |
Henry Mintzberg is a prominent figure in the field of management and strategy. His work often challenges the traditional view that strategy is purely a rational, top-down process. He emphasizes the importance of understanding how strategies actually unfold within organizations, acknowledging that many successful strategies were never initially planned but emerged incrementally or opportunistically. His concept of emergent strategy highlights the learning process within an organization and its ability to adapt to changing circumstances by taking action and seeing what works.
His book "Strategy Safari" co-authored with Bruce Ahlstrand and Joseph Lampel, explores various schools of thought on strategy formation, further detailing his own perspectives, particularly the learning school which aligns closely with the idea of emergent strategy. Understanding Mintzberg's views provides a richer perspective on strategy beyond simple long-term planning.
When the organizational requirements advocate tight cost control; frequent, detailed control reports; structured organization and responsibilities and incentives based on meeting strict quantitative targets then it is called:
Which of the following strategies are types of combination strategies?
(A) No change strategies
(B) Pause/Proceed with caution strategies
(C) Turn around strategies
(D) Profit strategies
(E) Concentration strategies