Arrange the following Acts in ascending order as per their year of enactment : A. RTI (Rights to Information Act) B. Competitions Act C. Information Technology Act D. Negotiable Instrument Act E. Indian Contract Act Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Ordering Indian Acts by Enactment Year
To arrange the given Acts in ascending order of their enactment year, we first need to determine the year each Act was passed:
- Indian Contract Act (E): Enacted in 1872.
- Negotiable Instrument Act (D): Enacted in 1881.
- Information Technology Act (C): Enacted in 2000.
- Competitions Act (B): Enacted in 2002.
- RTI (Rights to Information Act) (A): Enacted in 2005.
Ascending Order of Enactment
Arranging these Acts chronologically based on their enactment years, from the earliest to the latest:
- Indian Contract Act (E) - 1872
- Negotiable Instrument Act (D) - 1881
- Information Technology Act (C) - 2000
- Competitions Act (B) - 2002
- RTI Act (A) - 2005
The correct sequence is therefore E, D, C, B, A.
Final Answer Determination
Comparing this sequence with the given options, the correct arrangement is presented in Option 1.
The correct answer sequence is: E, D, C, B, A.
Important Questions from Indian Contract Act, 1872
Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R.
Assertion A : A, the owner of a ship by fraudulently representing her to be seaworthy induces B, on underwriter to insure the ship.
Reason R : B can obtain cancellation of the policy, as it is a fraud on account of fraudulent misrepresentation under the contract act.
In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:
In which of the following cases, the Doctrine of Supervening impossibility will apply?
Which one is False as per the relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act. 1872?
Which one is the correct sequence implied in the Indian Contract Act 1872?
(A) Offer of proposal
(B) Contract
(C) Promise
(D) Agreement
(E) Acceptance
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Statement I: Contracts whose objects or consideration are unlawful are void.
Statement II: Contracts in restraint of legal proceedings are void.
