All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which statements are correct about the provisions of Sec 40 (B) Remuneration to partners ?
i. Remuneration is allowed to working and non working partners
ii. Must be authorised by partnership deed
iii. Maximum limit
a. If book profit is negative, in case of loss Rs.1,50,000
b. In case of book profit on the first Rs.3,00,000 of book profit-1,50,000 Or 90% book profit, whichever is higher. On the balance of the book profit - 60%
iv. Maximum rate of interest is 15%

The correct answer is
ii and iii only

Understanding Remuneration Deductions for Partners under Sec 40(B)

Section 40(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, governs the deductibility of remuneration paid to partners by a firm. It outlines specific conditions and limits to ensure that only legitimate business expenses are claimed, preventing undue tax benefits.

Analysis of Statements on Section 40(B) Provisions

Statement i: Remuneration to Working and Non-working Partners

This statement asserts that remuneration is permissible for both working and non-working partners.

Analysis: According to Section 40(B), the Income Tax Act permits the deduction of remuneration (like salary, bonus, or commission) paid only to working partners. Payments made to non-working partners are not considered deductible expenses for the firm.

Conclusion: Statement (i) is incorrect.

Statement ii: Authorization by Partnership Deed

This statement requires remuneration payments to be authorized by the partnership deed.

Analysis: For any remuneration paid to partners to be eligible for deduction under Section 40(B), it must strictly adhere to the terms laid out in the partnership deed. Without explicit authorization in the deed, the payment is disallowed.

Conclusion: Statement (ii) is correct.

Statement iii: Maximum Limits for Remuneration

This statement details the maximum permissible limits for remuneration based on the firm's book profits.

  • Part (a) addresses the scenario of losses: "If book profit is negative, in case of loss Rs. 1,50,000". This correctly reflects the maximum allowable deduction limit of \text{Rs. } 1,50,000 in the event of a loss or absence of book profit.
  • Part (b) describes the limits for positive book profits: "In case of book profit on the first Rs. 3,00,000 of book profit - 1,50,000 Or 90% book profit, whichever is higher. On the balance of the book profit - 60%". While the specific structure "first Rs. 3,00,000" and the "whichever is higher" clause might differ from standard interpretations or latest amendments, the statement fundamentally captures the principle that deductibility is capped based on specific calculations involving different rates (like 90\% and 60\%) applied to different slabs of book profit.

The existence of these tiered limits and specific caps is a core aspect of Section 40(B).

Conclusion: Statement (iii) is deemed correct as it represents the principle of statutory limits.

Table: Maximum Limits for Partner Remuneration under Sec 40(B)

Scenario Maximum Deductible Remuneration Limit
Loss or Nil Book Profit \text{Rs. } 1,50,000
Positive Book Profit Calculated based on specific rates (e.g., 90\% on initial profit slab, 60\% on balance), subject to overall limits as per the Act.

Statement iv: Maximum Rate of Interest

This statement suggests the maximum allowable rate of interest on partner's capital is 15%.

Analysis: Section 40(B) explicitly limits the rate of interest deductible on capital balance paid to partners. The maximum rate allowed is 12\% per annum, not 15%.

Conclusion: Statement (iv) is incorrect.

Overall Conclusion

Based on the detailed analysis of each statement:

  • Statement (i) is incorrect.
  • Statement (ii) is correct.
  • Statement (iii) is correct.
  • Statement (iv) is incorrect.

Therefore, the correct statements concerning the provisions of Section 40(B) are (ii) and (iii).

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Indian Contract Act, 1872

  1. Given below are two statements: One is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R.

    Assertion A : A, the owner of a ship by fraudulently representing her to be seaworthy induces B, on underwriter to insure the ship.

    Reason R : B can obtain cancellation of the policy, as it is a fraud on account of fraudulent misrepresentation under the contract act.

    In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. In which of the following cases, the Doctrine of Supervening impossibility will apply?

  3. Which one is False as per the relevant provisions of the Indian Contract Act. 1872?

  4. Which one is the correct sequence implied in the Indian Contract Act 1872?

    (A) Offer of proposal

    (B) Contract

    (C) Promise

    (D) Agreement

    (E) Acceptance

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  5. Statement I: Contracts whose objects or consideration are unlawful are void.

    Statement II: Contracts in restraint of legal proceedings are void.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App