All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

An investigator commits Type I error in testing hypothesis when he / she

The correct answer is

Rejects null hypothesis when it is true

Understanding Type I Error in Hypothesis Testing

In statistical hypothesis testing, we make decisions about a population based on sample data. This process involves setting up two competing statements about the population: the null hypothesis ($\text{H}_0$) and the alternative hypothesis ($\text{H}_1$). The null hypothesis usually represents a statement of no effect, no difference, or no relationship, while the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher is trying to find evidence for.

Based on the sample data, we decide whether to reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis. However, since we are using sample data, there is always a possibility of making an incorrect decision. There are two main types of errors that can occur:

  • Type I Error: This occurs when we reject the null hypothesis ($\text{H}_0$) when it is actually true. It is often called a "false positive" because we conclude there is an effect or difference (by rejecting $\text{H}_0$) when there isn't one. The probability of committing a Type I error is denoted by the Greek letter alpha ($\alpha$) and is also known as the significance level of the test.
  • Type II Error: This occurs when we fail to reject (or accept) the null hypothesis ($\text{H}_0$) when it is actually false. This is a "false negative" because we fail to detect an effect or difference that actually exists. The probability of committing a Type II error is denoted by the Greek letter beta ($\beta$).

Analyzing the Options for Type I Error

Let's examine each option in the context of our understanding of Type I and Type II errors:

  1. Accepts null hypothesis when it is false: This describes a situation where the null hypothesis is false, but the investigator decides not to reject it. This is the definition of a Type II Error.
  2. Rejects null hypothesis when it is true: This describes a situation where the null hypothesis is true, but the investigator decides to reject it. This is the definition of a Type I Error.
  3. Accepts null hypothesis when it is true: This is a correct decision. The null hypothesis is true, and the investigator correctly fails to reject it.
  4. Rejects null hypothesis when it is false: This is also a correct decision. The null hypothesis is false, and the investigator correctly rejects it.

Summarizing Hypothesis Testing Outcomes and Errors

The possible outcomes of a hypothesis test can be summarized in a table, showing the relationship between the investigator's decision and the true state of the null hypothesis:

True State of $\text{H}_0$ Investigator's Decision: Reject $\text{H}_0$ Investigator's Decision: Fail to Reject $\text{H}_0$
$\text{H}_0$ is True Type I Error (False Positive)
Probability = $\alpha$
Correct Decision
Probability = $1 - \alpha$
$\text{H}_0$ is False Correct Decision (Power)
Probability = $1 - \beta$
Type II Error (False Negative)
Probability = $\beta$

From the table and the analysis of options, it is clear that a Type I error occurs when the investigator rejects the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

Conclusion on Type I Error

A Type I error in hypothesis testing is a critical concept. It represents the risk of incorrectly concluding that there is a significant effect or difference when, in reality, there is none. Researchers aim to control the probability of a Type I error by setting the significance level ($\alpha$) before conducting the test, commonly at 0.05 or 0.01.

Revision Table: Hypothesis Testing Errors

Error Type Description Analogy Probability
Type I Error Rejecting $\text{H}_0$ when $\text{H}_0$ is True False alarm, convicting an innocent person $\alpha$ (Significance Level)
Type II Error Failing to reject $\text{H}_0$ when $\text{H}_0$ is False Missing a real event, letting a guilty person go free $\beta$

Additional Information: Significance Level and Power

The probability of making a Type I error ($\alpha$) is determined by the significance level chosen by the investigator. Setting a lower $\alpha$ (e.g., 0.01 instead of 0.05) reduces the risk of a Type I error, but it increases the risk of a Type II error ($\beta$), assuming other factors remain constant.

The power of a hypothesis test is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. Power is equal to $1 - \beta$. A higher power means a lower chance of a Type II error. Researchers often aim for a power of 0.80 (80% chance of detecting a real effect). Power is influenced by the sample size, the effect size (the magnitude of the true difference or relationship), and the significance level ($\alpha$). There is an inherent trade-off between $\alpha$ and $\beta$: reducing one often increases the other.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Measurement and Analysis of Data - Teaching

  1. Given below are two statements

    Statement I: The qualitative data are powerful because they are collected from very sensitive social, historical and temporal context.

    Statement II: Context sensitivity cannot be completely removed from the qualitative data.

    In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below

  2. Given below is a summary of ANOVA for four groups of students tested in a research project:

    Source of varianceSS (Sum of squares)df (Degree of freedom)MS (Mean sum of squares)
    Between groups76323.33
    Within groups122167.62

    What will be the value of 'F' for the above data?

  3. An investigator used ANOVA to compare four groups of students on numerical ability on the basis of a test. After analysis of raw scores, the following results were obtained:

    Source of variationdfSum of Squares
    Between Groups3625.00
    Within Groups362128.00

    The value of F-ratio would be approximate:

  4. In randomly constituted two groups-experimental and control, a researcher obtains the following results after using a parametric 't' test:

    Value of t = 3 for N = 300

    On the basis of this evidence which decision in respect of substantive research hypothesis and the null hypothesis will be justified?

  5. Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Read the statements and choose the correct answer using the code given below.

    Assertion (A): Homogenous tests have low reliability.

    Reason (R): The range of test scores affects reliability.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App