An investigator commits Type I error in testing hypothesis when he / she
Rejects null hypothesis when it is true
In statistical hypothesis testing, we make decisions about a population based on sample data. This process involves setting up two competing statements about the population: the null hypothesis ($\text{H}_0$) and the alternative hypothesis ($\text{H}_1$). The null hypothesis usually represents a statement of no effect, no difference, or no relationship, while the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher is trying to find evidence for.
Based on the sample data, we decide whether to reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis. However, since we are using sample data, there is always a possibility of making an incorrect decision. There are two main types of errors that can occur:
Let's examine each option in the context of our understanding of Type I and Type II errors:
The possible outcomes of a hypothesis test can be summarized in a table, showing the relationship between the investigator's decision and the true state of the null hypothesis:
| True State of $\text{H}_0$ | Investigator's Decision: Reject $\text{H}_0$ | Investigator's Decision: Fail to Reject $\text{H}_0$ |
|---|---|---|
| $\text{H}_0$ is True | Type I Error (False Positive) Probability = $\alpha$ |
Correct Decision Probability = $1 - \alpha$ |
| $\text{H}_0$ is False | Correct Decision (Power) Probability = $1 - \beta$ |
Type II Error (False Negative) Probability = $\beta$ |
From the table and the analysis of options, it is clear that a Type I error occurs when the investigator rejects the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
A Type I error in hypothesis testing is a critical concept. It represents the risk of incorrectly concluding that there is a significant effect or difference when, in reality, there is none. Researchers aim to control the probability of a Type I error by setting the significance level ($\alpha$) before conducting the test, commonly at 0.05 or 0.01.
| Error Type | Description | Analogy | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I Error | Rejecting $\text{H}_0$ when $\text{H}_0$ is True | False alarm, convicting an innocent person | $\alpha$ (Significance Level) |
| Type II Error | Failing to reject $\text{H}_0$ when $\text{H}_0$ is False | Missing a real event, letting a guilty person go free | $\beta$ |
The probability of making a Type I error ($\alpha$) is determined by the significance level chosen by the investigator. Setting a lower $\alpha$ (e.g., 0.01 instead of 0.05) reduces the risk of a Type I error, but it increases the risk of a Type II error ($\beta$), assuming other factors remain constant.
The power of a hypothesis test is the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. Power is equal to $1 - \beta$. A higher power means a lower chance of a Type II error. Researchers often aim for a power of 0.80 (80% chance of detecting a real effect). Power is influenced by the sample size, the effect size (the magnitude of the true difference or relationship), and the significance level ($\alpha$). There is an inherent trade-off between $\alpha$ and $\beta$: reducing one often increases the other.
Given below are two statements
Statement I: The qualitative data are powerful because they are collected from very sensitive social, historical and temporal context.
Statement II: Context sensitivity cannot be completely removed from the qualitative data.
In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below
Given below is a summary of ANOVA for four groups of students tested in a research project:
| Source of variance | SS (Sum of squares) | df (Degree of freedom) | MS (Mean sum of squares) |
| Between groups | 76 | 3 | 23.33 |
| Within groups | 122 | 16 | 7.62 |
What will be the value of 'F' for the above data?
An investigator used ANOVA to compare four groups of students on numerical ability on the basis of a test. After analysis of raw scores, the following results were obtained:
| Source of variation | df | Sum of Squares |
| Between Groups | 3 | 625.00 |
| Within Groups | 36 | 2128.00 |
The value of F-ratio would be approximate:
In randomly constituted two groups-experimental and control, a researcher obtains the following results after using a parametric 't' test:
Value of t = 3 for N = 300
On the basis of this evidence which decision in respect of substantive research hypothesis and the null hypothesis will be justified?
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Read the statements and choose the correct answer using the code given below.
Assertion (A): Homogenous tests have low reliability.
Reason (R): The range of test scores affects reliability.