According to khosla, to keep the structure safe against piping, exit gradient to be provided should lie between?
0.15 and 0.20
Hydraulic structures like dams and barrages built on permeable foundations are susceptible to failure due to the flow of water beneath the structure. This phenomenon is known as sub-surface flow or seepage. As water seeps under the structure, it creates pressure. This pressure can cause issues like uplift pressure and piping.
Piping failure is a critical issue where the upward seepage pressure at the downstream end of the structure becomes high enough to lift soil particles. As more soil particles are lifted and carried away by the flowing water, voids are created, forming pipes or channels in the soil. These pipes gradually enlarge, eventually leading to the collapse of the structure.
Khosla's theory provides a method to analyze the sub-surface flow and the associated pressures under hydraulic structures. A key aspect of Khosla's theory is the concept of the exit gradient. The exit gradient is the hydraulic gradient at the downstream end of the structure where the seeping water emerges.
The hydraulic gradient is the loss of head per unit length of flow. The exit gradient ($\text{G}_{\text{E}}$) is the hydraulic gradient calculated precisely at the point where the seepage flow lines emerge onto the downstream bed level. It represents the steepest gradient and thus the highest upward pressure gradient.
According to Khosla's theory and observations, piping failure is initiated when the exit gradient at the downstream toe of the sheet pile (if present) or at the downstream end of the impervious floor exceeds the critical hydraulic gradient of the soil. The critical hydraulic gradient ($\text{i}_{\text{c}}$) is the gradient at which the effective stress in the soil becomes zero, causing the soil particles to be suspended in water.
The critical hydraulic gradient is given by the formula:
$$ \text{i}_{\text{c}} = \frac{\text{G} - 1}{1 + \text{e}} = \frac{\gamma_{\text{sub}}}{\gamma_{\text{w}}} $$
Where:
For typical sands, the value of $\text{i}_{\text{c}}$ is often around 1.0.
To prevent piping, the actual exit gradient ($\text{G}_{\text{E}}$) must be kept significantly lower than the critical hydraulic gradient ($\text{i}_{\text{c}}$). Khosla recommended a factor of safety against piping. The safe exit gradient is therefore a fraction of the critical hydraulic gradient.
The value of the safe exit gradient depends on the type of soil encountered at the foundation. Khosla's recommendations for safe exit gradients for different soil types are generally less than 1.0 (the typical critical gradient for sand).
For general design purposes, particularly for fine sand, Khosla suggested a safe exit gradient within a specific range to ensure adequate safety against piping failure. This recommended safe range is a balance between safety and economical design.
Based on Khosla's research and practical applications, the exit gradient to be provided to keep the structure safe against piping should lie within the range of 0.15 and 0.20. This range is often considered a safe design criterion for permeable foundations, particularly those consisting of fine sand, providing a sufficient factor of safety against the critical gradient.
Different soil types have different critical hydraulic gradients and require corresponding adjustments to the safe exit gradient. For example, coarser materials can withstand slightly higher exit gradients, while silts and clays are more complex and may require different considerations.
To summarize, for preventing piping according to Khosla's principles, the recommended range for the exit gradient, especially for fine sand, is 0.15 to 0.20. Designing the structure and its foundation treatment (like providing downstream sheet piles or an adequate length of impervious floor) aims to ensure that the calculated exit gradient under the worst-case head difference remains below this safe limit.
| Concept | Description | Relevance to Piping |
|---|---|---|
| Seepage | Flow of water through the porous foundation soil beneath a structure. | Causes uplift pressure and potential for piping. |
| Piping | Erosion and removal of soil particles by high upward seepage pressure, forming channels. | Major cause of failure in hydraulic structures on permeable foundations. |
| Hydraulic Gradient | Loss of hydraulic head per unit length of flow. | Indicates the driving force for seepage flow. |
| Exit Gradient ($\text{G}_{\text{E}}$) | Hydraulic gradient at the downstream end where seepage emerges. | Highest gradient, most critical location for piping initiation. |
| Critical Hydraulic Gradient ($\text{i}_{\text{c}}$) | Gradient at which effective stress is zero; soil particles become suspended. | Threshold gradient for piping initiation (theoretically). |
| Safe Exit Gradient | Recommended maximum permissible exit gradient for design. | Ensures $\text{G}_{\text{E}} < \text{i}_{\text{c}}$ with a factor of safety to prevent piping. |
Preventing piping is crucial for the longevity and safety of hydraulic structures. Besides controlling the exit gradient through structural design elements, other measures can be employed:
Khosla's theory provides analytical methods to calculate the exit gradient for various standard profiles of hydraulic structures, aiding engineers in designing safe structures by ensuring the calculated exit gradient is below the safe limit for the given soil type.
A divide wall is provided-
Which of the following is NOT a function of a cross-regulator?
A structure through which discharge can be regulated is known as ________.
Which of the following work is not performed by canal headwork
Under which one of the following categories is the river Ganga classified in the reach through UP and Bihar?