Condition Larvae in diapause Larvae NOT in diapause Treatment 1 $27\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, 12:12 LD 2 28 Treatment 2 $18\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, 12:12 LD 7 23 Treatment 3 $27\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, DD 12 18 Treatment 4 $18\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, DD 29 1
The experiment examines the effect of two abiotic factors, temperature and daylength, on the diapause of moth larvae. We evaluate the provided data to determine which factors influence this biological process.
| Condition | Larvae in diapause | Larvae NOT in diapause | Total Larvae |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1: $27\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, 12:12 LD | 22 | 8 | 30 |
| Treatment 2: $18\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, 12:12 LD | 7 | 23 | 30 |
| Treatment 3: $27\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, DD | 12 | 18 | 30 |
| Treatment 4: $18\text{ }^\circ\text{C}$, DD | 29 | 1 | 30 |
Compare results while keeping daylength constant:
These comparisons indicate that temperature influences diapause.
Compare results while keeping temperature constant:
These comparisons indicate that daylength influences diapause.
The data clearly show that both temperature and daylength affect the rate of diapause in the moth larvae. Therefore:
The table below lists potential environmental conditions in future climates, related to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ($CO_2$) and mean annual temperature (MAT).
The table also lists potential outcomes with respect to whether conditions will favour grasses with C3 or C4 photosynthetic pathways.
Assuming no other changes in environmental conditions, match the options in the two columns.
| Environmental conditions | Outcomes |
| (P) Increased $CO_2$, no change in MAT | (i) C3 performs better than C4 |
| (Q) No change in $CO_2$, increased MAT | (ii) C4 performs better than C3 |
| (iii) C3 and C4 perform equally |