The question asks to identify the historical chronicler who claimed that the influence of Lal Kunwar during the reign of Mughal Emperor Jahandar Shah was comparable to that of Nur Jahan during Jahangir's time, and even stated that coins were issued in her name. This specific observation and comparison are recorded in certain historical accounts of the period.

Identifying the Historian on Lal Kunwar's Influence

During the brief reign of Jahandar Shah (1712-1713), Lal Kunwar, a courtesan, gained immense influence. Historical sources describe the extent of her power and the unusual privileges she enjoyed, which led to comparisons with Nur Jahan, the powerful consort of Emperor Jahangir.

Different historians and chroniclers documented the events of the late Mughal period. The statement comparing Lal Kunwar's days to those of Nur Jahan and mentioning the controversial claim of coins being issued in her name is attributed to one specific historian among the options provided.

Analyzing the Options

Let's look at the options provided:

1. Hadi Kamwar Khan: A historian known for his work "Tazkirat us-Salatin Chaghta," which covers the history of the Chaghtai (Mughal) dynasty. His account provides details about the events during the reigns of the later Mughal emperors, including Jahandar Shah.
2. Khafi Khan: The author of "Muntakhab al-Lubab," a detailed history of the Mughal Empire covering a long period, including the reign of Aurangzeb and his successors.
3. Shahnawaz Khan: Likely referring to Samsam ud Daula Shah Nawaz Khan, author of "Ma'asir al-Umara," a biographical dictionary of Mughal nobles.
4. Rustam Ali Shahabadi: Author of "Tarikh-i Hind," another historical account covering various periods of Indian history, including the later Mughals.

The Statement Attribution

Historical research indicates that the specific statement about Lal Kunwar's influence reviving the 'days of Nur Jahan' and the claim regarding coins being issued in her name (though widely considered false by modern historians, the *statement* itself is historical) is found in the writings of Hadi Kamwar Khan in his work "Tazkirat us-Salatin Chaghta".

While other historians like Khafi Khan also documented the events of Jahandar Shah's reign and Lal Kunwar's influence, this particular phrasing and comparison are most prominently associated with Hadi Kamwar Khan's account.

Therefore, the historian who stated that the days of Nur Jahan were revived for Lal Kunwar and coins were issued in her name is Hadi Kamwar Khan.

Revision Table: Mughal Historians & Lal Kunwar

Additional Information on Lal Kunwar and Mughal History

• Lal Kunwar: A favourite of Jahandar Shah. Her influence was seen by many nobles and chroniclers as excessive and detrimental to the administration. The claim about coins being issued in her name is generally considered false by historians, possibly a rumour or exaggeration reflecting the public perception of her power.
• Jahandar Shah: His reign was very short (1712-1713). He was known for being pleasure-loving and allowing favourites like Lal Kunwar to wield significant power, which contributed to the instability of his rule.
• Nur Jahan: The wife of Emperor Jahangir. She was a highly influential figure in the Mughal court, especially during the latter part of Jahangir's reign. She exercised considerable political power, and coins were indeed issued jointly in her name and Jahangir's name, a fact that made her influence historically significant and provided a basis for later comparisons like the one made regarding Lal Kunwar.
• Significance of the Statement: The comparison made by Hadi Kamwar Khan highlights the perceived extent of Lal Kunwar's power and the dismay it caused among some observers, contrasting it with the established historical precedent of a powerful empress consort like Nur Jahan, while also including a controversial claim about coinage to emphasize her purported authority.