All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Who among the following said that there is in essence no difference between the legal personality of a company and that of an individual ?

The correct answer is
Kelson

Kelson's View on Legal Personality

The question asks to identify the jurist who viewed the legal personality of a company as essentially indistinguishable from that of an individual.

Kelson's Theory of Legal Personality

Hans Kelsen, a prominent legal philosopher, proposed the "Pure Theory of Law." According to Kelsen:

  • Legal personality, whether of an individual or a corporation, is a legal construct.
  • The law imputes rights and duties to both individuals and companies.
  • From a purely legal standpoint, the way the law assigns these roles is fundamentally the same, thus there is no essential difference in their legal personality.
  • He saw both as centers of imputation, created by the legal order.

Comparing Legal Theorists

While other theorists like Maitland and Gierke discussed group personality and corporate identity extensively, Kelson's specific contribution focused on the abstract, normative nature of legal personhood, equating the legal status of companies and individuals as creations of legal norms.

Therefore, Kelson is the jurist who stated that there is essentially no difference between the legal personality of a company and that of an individual.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Jurisprudence

  1. Which one of the following Jurists asserts that 'Law and morality are complementary and supplementary to each other'?
  2. Salmond enumerates five characteristics of legal rights. Four such characteristics are
    (a) Subject of right
    (b) Object of right
    (c) Content of right
    (d) Title of right
    The fifth characteristic is:
  3. Who among the following said that there is in essence, no difference between the legal personality of a company and that of an individual?
  4. Which of the following statements is NOT correct in regard to distinction between Civil and Criminal liability?
  5. Which of the following could be considered to be advantages of Legislation over Precedent?
    (a) Abrogative capability
    (b) Fore knowledge
    (c) Prospective application
    (d) Systematic arrangement

    Choose the correction option:
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App