Patent Act 1970: Statement Analysis

This section analyzes the statements concerning the Indian Patent Act, 1970, to identify the incorrect ones as per the question.

Statement A Analysis: Atomic Energy Inventions

This statement is correct. The Indian Patent Act, 1970, specifically excludes inventions related to atomic energy from patentability, as outlined in Section 3(p).

Statement B Analysis: Originality and Novelty

As indicated by the correct answer, this statement is considered incorrect. While novelty is a crucial requirement, patentability fundamentally requires the invention to be novel and involve an inventive step (i.e., be non-obvious). The term 'originality' itself might be deemed insufficient or less precise than 'inventive step' in the context of patent law prerequisites.

Statement C Analysis: IPAB's Current Role

This statement is incorrect. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) was abolished in 2021. Consequently, IPAB does not currently handle IPR disputes. Appeals related to patent matters are now filed with the respective High Courts.

Statement D Analysis: Patent Validity Term

This statement is correct. Generally, patents granted under the Indian Patent Act, 1970, have a validity period of 20 years from the filing date of the patent application.

Identifying Incorrect Statements: B and C

Based on the analysis:

• Statement B is considered incorrect due to the specific requirements of novelty and inventive step, where 'originality' might be seen as imprecise.
• Statement C is factually incorrect because the IPAB no longer exists.

Therefore, the combination of statements B and C represents the incorrect statements regarding the Indian Patent Act, 1970.