All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which school of classical Indian philosophy asserts the following?
1. It is fallacious to take any knowledge claim (jñāna) as absolute.
2. To recognize that all knowledge claims are contextually and partially true does not lead to skepticism.

The correct answer is
Jainism

Jainism's View on Knowledge Relativity

The question describes a philosophical stance where knowledge claims are considered neither absolute nor universally valid. It also states that recognizing this partial truth does not result in skepticism. This perspective aligns closely with the core tenets of Jainism, particularly its doctrines of anekāntavāda and syādvāda.

Understanding Anekāntavāda and Syādvāda

  • Anekāntavāda: This principle means "non-one-sidedness" or "many-sidedness." It asserts that reality is complex and possesses infinite qualities. Any single viewpoint or knowledge claim captures only one aspect of reality, making it inherently limited.
  • Syādvāda: This is the doctrine of "conditional predication." It suggests that all statements about reality are conditional and relative. Using the prefix "syāt" (meaning "perhaps" or "in a certain way") before a proposition acknowledges its partial and conditional nature. For example, a thing might be "syāt-true" (conditionally true) from one perspective, but not absolutely true from all perspectives.

Applying Jain Doctrines to the Question

The two points mentioned in the question can be directly mapped to Jain philosophy:

  • Condition 1: Knowledge Claims Are Not Absolute

    Anekāntavāda directly supports this. It posits that reality has countless facets, and any single jñāna (knowledge claim) can only grasp a limited number of these facets. Therefore, no knowledge claim can be considered absolutely true or comprehensive.

  • Condition 2: Partial Truth Avoids Skepticism

    Syādvāda addresses this. By asserting that every viewpoint holds a degree of conditional truth ("syāt"), Jainism avoids falling into nihilism or extreme skepticism. It doesn't deny the possibility of knowledge but affirms that knowledge is always partial and context-dependent. This nuanced approach allows for meaningful discourse and understanding without claiming absolute certainty.

Therefore, Jainism is the school of classical Indian philosophy that asserts these views on knowledge claims.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Religion & Indian Society

  1. Which one of the following classical Indian schools of thought do the philosophical texts Spandakārikā and Pratyabhijñāsūtra belong to?
  2. According to the Advaitic text Vedāntaparibhāṣā, “Those means of knowledge are six in number (tāni ca pramāṇāni ṣaṭ)”. These are:
  3. “Desire, cognition etc. are qualities that necessarily require a substance and therefore individually constitute the necessary mark or sign of substance, which could then be identified as soul.”

    Which one of the following classical Indian thinkers has made this argument?
  4. Which of the following options is/are included among the four states of Ātman as delineated in the Mānḍukya Upaniṣad?
  5. Which of the following options is/are NOT correct according to Śaiva-siddhānta?
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App