Which one of the following statements is false?
Regression coefficient of the two variables may have different algebraic symbols for real life situations
The question asks us to identify the false statement among the given options concerning regression coefficients and the coefficient of correlation. Let's examine each statement based on the known properties of these statistical measures.
The first statement says that regression coefficients are independent of change of origin but not of change of scale. Let the original variables be \(X\) and \(Y\). Suppose we perform a change of origin and scale to get new variables \(U = \frac{X - a}{c}\) and \(V = \frac{Y - b}{d}\), where \(a, b\) are changes in origin and \(c, d\) are changes in scale (\(c, d \neq 0\)).
The regression coefficient of \(Y\) on \(X\), denoted by \(b_{yx}\), is related to the regression coefficient of \(V\) on \(U\), denoted by \(b_{vu}\), by the formula:
\(b_{yx} = \frac{d}{c} b_{vu}\)
This formula shows that \(b_{yx}\) depends on the scale factors \(c\) and \(d\). If there is only a change of origin (\(c=1, d=1\)), then \(b_{yx} = b_{vu}\), meaning the coefficient is independent of the change of origin. If there is only a change of scale (\(a=0, b=0\)), then \(b_{yx} = \frac{d}{c} b_{vu}\), showing dependence on the scale. Therefore, statement 1 is true.
The second statement claims that both regression coefficients cannot assume a value (ignoring algebraic sign) greater than one. Let the two regression coefficients be \(b_{yx}\) (regression of Y on X) and \(b_{xy}\) (regression of X on Y). A fundamental property relating regression coefficients and the correlation coefficient (\(r\)) is:
\(r^2 = b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}\)
We know that the coefficient of correlation \(r\) must lie between \(-1\) and \(1\), i.e., \(-1 \le r \le 1\). Squaring this inequality gives \(0 \le r^2 \le 1\).
Substituting the relationship, we get \(b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy} \le 1\). The regression coefficients \(b_{yx}\) and \(b_{xy}\) must always have the same sign as the correlation coefficient \(r\). Thus, their product \(b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}\) is always non-negative, which is consistent with \(r^2\).
Now, consider the values ignoring the algebraic sign, i.e., \(|b_{yx}|\) and \(|b_{xy}|\). Since \(b_{yx}\) and \(b_{xy}\) have the same sign, \(|b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}| = |b_{yx}| \cdot |b_{xy}|\). And since \(r^2 = b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}\), we have \(r^2 = |b_{yx}| \cdot |b_{xy}|\).
Given \(r^2 \le 1\), it implies \(|b_{yx}| \cdot |b_{xy}| \le 1\).
If both \(|b_{yx}| > 1\) and \(|b_{xy}| > 1\), then their product \(|b_{yx}| \cdot |b_{xy}|\) would be greater than \(1 \times 1 = 1\). This contradicts the condition \(|b_{yx}| \cdot |b_{xy}| \le 1\). Therefore, it is not possible for both regression coefficients to have magnitudes greater than one simultaneously. Statement 2 is true.
The third statement says that the regression coefficients of the two variables may have different algebraic symbols (signs) for real-life situations. The regression coefficient of \(Y\) on \(X\) is given by \(b_{yx} = r \frac{\sigma_y}{\sigma_x}\), and the regression coefficient of \(X\) on \(Y\) is given by \(b_{xy} = r \frac{\sigma_x}{\sigma_y}\), where \(\sigma_x\) and \(\sigma_y\) are the standard deviations of \(X\) and \(Y\), respectively. Standard deviations are always non-negative (\(\sigma_x \ge 0, \sigma_y \ge 0\)). Assuming \(\sigma_x > 0\) and \(\sigma_y > 0\) (for non-constant variables), the signs of \(b_{yx}\) and \(b_{xy}\) are determined solely by the sign of the correlation coefficient \(r\).
In all cases, the regression coefficients \(b_{yx}\) and \(b_{xy}\) must have the same algebraic sign. The statement that they "may have different algebraic symbols" is therefore false.
The fourth statement says that the coefficient of correlation is independent of the change of origin and scale of data. This is a fundamental property of the correlation coefficient. Let \(r_{xy}\) be the correlation between \(X\) and \(Y\), and \(r_{uv}\) be the correlation between \(U = \frac{X - a}{c}\) and \(V = \frac{Y - b}{d}\).
Provided that the scale factors \(c\) and \(d\) are positive (\(c > 0, d > 0\)), the correlation remains unchanged:
\(r_{uv} = r_{xy}\)
If one or both scale factors are negative, the magnitude of the correlation remains the same, but the sign might flip if only one is negative. However, the statement refers to "change of origin and scale" generally. Standard definitions and properties confirm independence from origin and positive scale changes. With positive scale changes, the coefficient is exactly the same. The statement is generally considered true in this context.
Based on our analysis:
The false statement is that the regression coefficient of the two variables may have different algebraic symbols for real life situations.
| Statement | Property | Truth Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Regression coefficients & origin/scale | Independent of origin, dependent on scale | True |
| 2. Both regression coefficients magnitude > 1 | Cannot both have magnitude > 1 | True |
| 3. Regression coefficients & different signs | Must have the same sign (as \(r\)) | False |
| 4. Correlation coefficient & origin/scale | Independent of origin and positive scale | True |
| Property | Regression Coefficients (\(b_{yx}, b_{xy}\)) | Correlation Coefficient (\(r\)) |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Origin | Independent | Independent |
| Change of Scale | Dependent (by factor d/c or c/d) | Independent (for positive scale) |
| Sign | Must have the same sign as \(r\) | Determines the sign of regression coefficients |
| Relationship | \(r^2 = b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}\) | \(r = \pm \sqrt{b_{yx} \cdot b_{xy}}\) (sign is same as regression coefficients) |
| Magnitude Constraint | Cannot both have magnitude > 1 | Magnitude always \(\le 1\) (\(-1 \le r \le 1\)) |
Regression Analysis: This statistical method is used to estimate the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. Linear regression fits a straight line to the data. There are two regression lines for two variables \(X\) and \(Y\): Regression of Y on X (predicting Y from X) and Regression of X on Y (predicting X from Y).
Correlation Analysis: This statistical method measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables.
Change of Origin: Adding or subtracting a constant value to all observations of a variable. This shifts the data points on the axis but doesn't change their relative positions or spread.
Change of Scale: Multiplying or dividing all observations of a variable by a non-zero constant. This stretches or compresses the data points on the axis, changing their spread and relative positions if the scale factor is different for the two variables.
Understanding how these measures behave under transformations like change of origin and scale is crucial in interpreting statistical results correctly, especially when working with transformed data.
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A sphere of volume V is made of a material with lower density than water. While on Earth, it floats on water with its volume f1V (f1 < 1) submerged. On the other hand, on a spaceship accelerating with acceleration a < g (g is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth) in outer space, its submerged volume in water is f2V. Then:
A railway wagon (open at the top) of mass M1 is moving with speed v1 along a straight track. As a result of rain, after some time it gets partially filled with water so that the mass of the wagon becomes M2 and speed becomes v2. Taking the rain to be falling vertically and the water stationery inside the wagon, the relation between the two speeds v1 and v2 is :
Consider the following statements:
1. Distance between the longitudes becomes zero on North Pole and South Pole.
2. Distance between the longitudes is maximum on the Equator.
3. Number of longitudes is more than number of latitudes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
One block of 2⋅0 kg mass is placed on top of another block of 3⋅0 kg mass. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is 0⋅2. The bottom block is pulled with a horizontal force F such that both the blocks move together without slipping. Taking acceleration due to gravity as 10 m/s2, the maximum value of the frictional force is :