Which one of the following statements about the Ain-i-Akbari is not correct?
It was later revised by Sadullah Khan on the orders of Shah Jahan
The question asks us to identify the statement that is *not* correct regarding the Ain-i-Akbari. Let's examine each statement based on historical facts about this important historical text.
Statement 1: It was written by Abu'l Fazl.
This statement is correct. The Ain-i-Akbari, a detailed document on the administration of the Mughal Empire under Emperor Akbar, was indeed authored by his court historian, Abu'l Fazl ibn Mubarak.
Statement 2: It is a part of a larger work called Akbar Nama.
This statement is also correct. The Ain-i-Akbari is the third and final volume of the much larger historical work, the Akbar Nama (Book of Akbar), which chronicles the reign of Emperor Akbar.
Statement 3: It describes the Mughal Empire as having a diverse population and a composite culture.
This statement is generally considered correct. The Ain-i-Akbari provides extensive data on various aspects of the empire, including land records, revenues, castes, religious groups, and social customs across different regions. This detailed information inherently reflects the diverse nature of the Mughal population and the composite culture that developed during Akbar's reign.
Statement 4: It was later revised by Sadullah Khan on the orders of Shah Jahan.
This statement is incorrect. The Ain-i-Akbari was completed during Akbar's reign by Abu'l Fazl. While historical texts are often copied, summarized, or studied in later periods, the primary text of the Ain-i-Akbari itself was not revised by Sadullah Khan (a prominent Wazir or Prime Minister under Emperor Shah Jahan) on Shah Jahan's orders. Sadullah Khan was involved in revenue administration and other matters during Shah Jahan's rule, but his work did not involve revising the original Ain-i-Akbari text.
Based on the analysis of each statement, the statement that is not correct about the Ain-i-Akbari is that it was later revised by Sadullah Khan on the orders of Shah Jahan. The text was a product of Akbar's era, authored by Abu'l Fazl, and while its information might have been used or referred to later, the original work was not revised by officials from Shah Jahan's court.
Therefore, the incorrect statement is: It was later revised by Sadullah Khan on the orders of Shah Jahan.
| Aspect | Details about Ain-i-Akbari |
|---|---|
| Author | Abu'l Fazl |
| Larger Work | Part of Akbar Nama (Third Volume) |
| Period Covered | Reign of Emperor Akbar |
| Content Focus | Administration, Statistics, Geography, Society, Culture, Revenue System of the Mughal Empire |
| Language | Persian |
The Ain-i-Akbari is an invaluable source for understanding the Mughal Empire, particularly the reign of Akbar. It is divided into five books:
The level of detail in the Ain-i-Akbari provides historians with crucial data on demographics, economic conditions, administrative structures, and social norms of the period, highlighting the organized nature of the Mughal state under Akbar and reflecting the empire's diverse character.
Chandimangala, a sixteenth century text, was composed by
Which one of the following travelogues has given an insight on the reign of Muhammad Bin Tughlaq?
Who among the following chroniclers wrote about Raziyya and recognised that she was more able and qualified than all her brothers?
Who among the following had written Kitab-ul-Hind that gave an incisive description of early 11 th Century India?
Who authored ‘Akbarnama’?