Which one of the following is invalid for the relationship among the agent, the sub-agent and the principal?
Sub-agent is responsible to the agent only
In commercial law, an agency relationship involves three main parties: the Principal, the Agent, and sometimes a Sub-agent. The Principal authorizes the Agent to act on their behalf. The Agent, in turn, may sometimes appoint a Sub-agent to perform tasks related to the agency, but under the Agent's control and direction. Understanding the responsibilities and relationships among these parties is crucial.
Let's examine each statement provided in the options to determine which one is invalid for the relationship among the agent, the sub-agent, and the principal.
Statement 1: Sub-agent works under the control and on the directions of the agent
This statement is generally valid. A sub-agent is appointed by the agent and acts under the agent's supervision and instructions, not directly under the principal's, unless the agent is authorized to delegate and appoints the sub-agent as a substitute agent in specific circumstances (a substituted agent is different from a sub-agent).
Statement 2: Sub-agent is responsible to the agent only
This statement is invalid. While the sub-agent is primarily responsible to the agent who appointed them, they also owe duties to the principal. For example, a principal can hold a properly appointed sub-agent directly liable for fraud or willful wrong. Therefore, stating the sub-agent is responsible *only* to the agent is incorrect.
Statement 3: Privity of contract exists between the principle and the sub-agent
This statement is generally considered valid in the context of a properly appointed sub-agent. Although the sub-agent's contract is directly with the agent, agency law establishes a direct legal relationship (often referred to as privity for certain purposes like accountability) between the principal and a sub-agent appointed with the principal's authority (express or implied). The principal is bound by the acts of a properly appointed sub-agent, and the principal can enforce duties against the sub-agent.
Statement 4: Agent is responsible to the principle for the acts of the sub-agent
This statement is generally valid. When an agent appoints a sub-agent, the agent remains responsible to the principal for the acts of the sub-agent. The agent is accountable to the principal as if the sub-agent's actions were their own, especially if the sub-agent was appointed without proper authority or supervision.
Based on the analysis, the statement that is invalid for the relationship among the agent, the sub-agent, and the principal is that the Sub-agent is responsible to the agent only. The sub-agent has responsibilities towards the principal as well.
| Relationship Aspect | Principal and Agent | Agent and Sub-agent | Principal and Sub-agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contractual Basis | Direct contract of agency | Direct contract between agent & sub-agent | Generally no direct contract of appointment, but legal relationship exists if sub-agent properly appointed |
| Control & Direction | Principal controls Agent | Agent controls Sub-agent | Indirect control through Agent; direct duties owed by Sub-agent |
| Responsibility | Agent responsible to Principal | Sub-agent responsible to Agent | Sub-agent can be directly liable to Principal for certain acts (e.g., fraud, willful wrong); Agent responsible for Sub-agent's acts to Principal |
| Privity | Yes | Yes | Yes, for purposes of accountability and direct action in certain cases (if sub-agent properly appointed) |
The statement that the sub-agent is responsible *only* to the agent is incorrect because the sub-agent also has a legal relationship and duties towards the principal, especially when appointed properly.
Therefore, the invalid statement is: Sub-agent is responsible to the agent only.
| Term | Definition | Key Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Principal | The person for whom an act is done by the agent. | Authorize agent, bound by agent's (and properly appointed sub-agent's) lawful acts. |
| Agent | A person employed to do any act for another, or to represent another in dealings with third persons. | Act for Principal, appoint sub-agent (if permitted), responsible to Principal for own acts and sub-agent's acts. |
| Sub-agent | A person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the business of the agency. | Act under Agent's direction, responsible to Agent, also owes duties to Principal. |
According to sections of contract law dealing with agency (such as Sections 190-193 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872), when a sub-agent is properly appointed (i.e., the agent had authority to appoint a sub-agent):
This clarifies that a sub-agent's responsibility is not limited *only* to the agent, but extends to the principal in certain critical areas, making statement 2 invalid.
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A sphere of volume V is made of a material with lower density than water. While on Earth, it floats on water with its volume f1V (f1 < 1) submerged. On the other hand, on a spaceship accelerating with acceleration a < g (g is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth) in outer space, its submerged volume in water is f2V. Then:
A railway wagon (open at the top) of mass M1 is moving with speed v1 along a straight track. As a result of rain, after some time it gets partially filled with water so that the mass of the wagon becomes M2 and speed becomes v2. Taking the rain to be falling vertically and the water stationery inside the wagon, the relation between the two speeds v1 and v2 is :
Consider the following statements:
1. Distance between the longitudes becomes zero on North Pole and South Pole.
2. Distance between the longitudes is maximum on the Equator.
3. Number of longitudes is more than number of latitudes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
One block of 2⋅0 kg mass is placed on top of another block of 3⋅0 kg mass. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is 0⋅2. The bottom block is pulled with a horizontal force F such that both the blocks move together without slipping. Taking acceleration due to gravity as 10 m/s2, the maximum value of the frictional force is :