All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which one of the following does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change?

The correct answer is

Random mating

Microevolutionary Change Explained

Microevolution refers to small-scale evolutionary changes within a population over relatively short periods. These changes are typically measured by shifts in allele frequencies from one generation to the next. Several factors can cause these changes, leading to evolution within the population.

Factors Contributing to Microevolution

The primary mechanisms that drive microevolutionary change are those that alter the genetic makeup or allele frequencies within a population. Let's look at some key factors:

  • Mutation: This is the ultimate source of new genetic variation. Mutations introduce new alleles into a gene pool, directly changing allele frequencies, although often at a slow rate initially.
  • Genetic Drift: This is the random fluctuation of allele frequencies from one generation to the next, particularly pronounced in small populations. Random events can lead to certain alleles becoming more or less common, irrespective of their selective advantage.
  • Natural Selection: This occurs when individuals with certain traits (determined by their alleles) have higher survival or reproductive rates than others. Over time, this leads to an increase in the frequency of advantageous alleles in the population.
  • Gene Flow: The movement of individuals (and their alleles) into or out of a population. Migration can change allele frequencies by introducing new alleles or altering the proportions of existing ones.

Random Mating and Microevolution

The question asks which factor does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change. Let's consider random mating.

  • Random Mating: This is a condition where individuals in a population mate without regard to their genotype. While random mating affects how alleles are combined into genotypes (i.e., it influences genotype frequencies), it does not inherently change the overall allele frequencies in the population from one generation to the next.
  • Random mating is actually one of the conditions required for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which describes a theoretical population that is not evolving. A population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium has stable allele and genotype frequencies across generations.

Factors that violate Hardy-Weinberg assumptions, such as non-random mating (like assortative mating where individuals with similar phenotypes mate), mutation, gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection, are the ones that cause microevolution.

Therefore, random mating itself does not cause allele frequencies to change and thus does not contribute to microevolutionary change. Its absence (non-random mating) can contribute to evolutionary change by affecting genotype frequencies, which can indirectly influence selection.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of how different factors influence allele frequencies within a population, mutation, genetic drift, and natural selection are all recognized drivers of microevolution. Random mating, however, is a condition of genetic equilibrium and does not cause a change in allele frequencies.

The factor that does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change is random mating.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Evolution and Behavior

  1. Reduction in the frequency of heterozygous genotype with a concomitant increase in the frequency of homozygous genotype, in context of random mating is due to

  2. A founder population has an Aa heterozygous genotype with a frequency of 1, and no individual with either AA or aa genotypes. With repeated self-fertilization, the frequency of AA, Aa and aa after three generations will be:

  3. Many species of birds call at dawn in temperate regions. The phenomenon is referred to as "Dawn Chorus". Several explanations have been proposed for this. Which one of the options is NOT a correct explanation for the occurrence of "Dawn Chorus"?

  4. Column X lists evolutionary ideas and scientists who proposed them, and Column Y lists the description of these ideas.

    Column X

    Column Y

    A.

    Modern synthesis by Julian Huxley

    I.

    A stochastic process where lineages show random geneological relationships when traced back in time. 

    B.

    Phyletic gradualism by Charles Darwin

    II.

    Evolutionary change appears instantaneous between geological sedimentary layers.

    C.

    Punctuated equilibrium by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge

    III.

    Synthesis between Mendelian genetics, population genetics, and selection theory.

    D.

    Coalescent model (inspired by) Wright- Fisher model

    IV.

    New species arise by the gradual transformation of ancestral species.

    Which one of the following options represents all correct matches between Column X and Column Y? 
  5. Which one of the following statements about the molecular clock hypothesis as proposed by Zuckerkandl and Pauling 1962 is CORRECT?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App