Which one of the following does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change?
Random mating
Microevolution refers to small-scale evolutionary changes within a population over relatively short periods. These changes are typically measured by shifts in allele frequencies from one generation to the next. Several factors can cause these changes, leading to evolution within the population.
The primary mechanisms that drive microevolutionary change are those that alter the genetic makeup or allele frequencies within a population. Let's look at some key factors:
The question asks which factor does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change. Let's consider random mating.
Factors that violate Hardy-Weinberg assumptions, such as non-random mating (like assortative mating where individuals with similar phenotypes mate), mutation, gene flow, genetic drift, and natural selection, are the ones that cause microevolution.
Therefore, random mating itself does not cause allele frequencies to change and thus does not contribute to microevolutionary change. Its absence (non-random mating) can contribute to evolutionary change by affecting genotype frequencies, which can indirectly influence selection.
Based on the analysis of how different factors influence allele frequencies within a population, mutation, genetic drift, and natural selection are all recognized drivers of microevolution. Random mating, however, is a condition of genetic equilibrium and does not cause a change in allele frequencies.
The factor that does NOT contribute to microevolutionary change is random mating.
Reduction in the frequency of heterozygous genotype with a concomitant increase in the frequency of homozygous genotype, in context of random mating is due to
A founder population has an Aa heterozygous genotype with a frequency of 1, and no individual with either AA or aa genotypes. With repeated self-fertilization, the frequency of AA, Aa and aa after three generations will be:
Many species of birds call at dawn in temperate regions. The phenomenon is referred to as "Dawn Chorus". Several explanations have been proposed for this. Which one of the options is NOT a correct explanation for the occurrence of "Dawn Chorus"?
Column X | Column Y | ||
A. | Modern synthesis by Julian Huxley | I. | A stochastic process where lineages show random geneological relationships when traced back in time. |
B. | Phyletic gradualism by Charles Darwin | II. | Evolutionary change appears instantaneous between geological sedimentary layers. |
C. | Punctuated equilibrium by Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge | III. | Synthesis between Mendelian genetics, population genetics, and selection theory. |
D. | Coalescent model (inspired by) Wright- Fisher model | IV. | New species arise by the gradual transformation of ancestral species. |
Which one of the following statements about the molecular clock hypothesis as proposed by Zuckerkandl and Pauling 1962 is CORRECT?