Directions: In this section, you have two short passages. After each passage, you will find some items based on the passage. Read the passage carefully and answer the items based on it. You are required to select your answers based solely on the contents of the passage and the opinion of the author, and indicate your response on the Answer Sheet accordingly. People do not understand the nature or ramifications of most educational changes. They become involved in change voluntarily or involuntarily and in either case experience ambivalence about its meanings, form, and consequences. I have implied that there are a number of things at stake-changes in goals, skills, philosophy or beliefs, behaviour, etc. Subjectively these different aspects are experienced in a diffuse, incoherent manner. Change often is not conceived of as being multidimensional. Objectively, it is possible to clarify the meaning of an educational change by identifying and describing its separate dimensions. Ignorance of these dimensions explains a number of interesting phenomena in the field of educational changes : for example, why some people accept an innovation they do not understand; why some aspects of a change are implemented and others not; why strategies for change neglect certain essential components. The concept of objective reality is tricky. Reality is always defined by individuals and groups. But individuals and groups interact to produce social phenomena (constitutions, laws, policies, educational change programmes), which exist outside any given individual. There is also the danger that the objective reality is only the reflection of the producers of change and thus simply a glorified version of their subjective conceptions. We can reduce this problem by following the practice of posing double questions : "What is the existing conception of reality on a given issue?" Followed quickly by "says who?"
Which of the following sums up the idea of the author?
Change has to be conceptualised collectively in its many dimensions, and dealt with objectively
The author addresses how people often fail to comprehend the true nature or ramifications of most educational changes. This lack of understanding leads to feelings of ambivalence, where individuals experience mixed emotions about the meaning, form, and outcomes of these changes. A key point highlighted is that change is frequently perceived subjectively and in a fragmented way, rather than being recognized as multidimensional. This means that change affects various aspects of education simultaneously, such as goals, required skills, underlying philosophy, and behavioral practices. While the subjective experience can be confusing, the passage suggests that defining and describing the distinct dimensions of an educational change can help clarify its meaning more objectively. The author notes that failing to identify these dimensions is the reason behind several issues, like people accepting innovations they don't fully grasp or implementing only certain parts of a change initiative.
To find the option that best sums up the author's perspective, let's evaluate each choice against the passage's content:
The author's perspective emphasizes a structured approach to educational change:
The general tone of the passage is
The use of machines has failed to bring us
According to the passage, our civilization would be made greater
Plastic has distressing effects on
According to the passage, how do we use the powers bestowed upon us by science?
Plastic pollution appears to be
Plastic is considered an essential commodity because
What best describes bulimia?
When an activity requires too much effort we feel:
What kind of attitude does the writer advocate for a life of fulfilment?
Why did the young lady approach the piano teacher for music lessons?
What does 'bread making' attitude consist of?