All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Directions: In this section, you have two short passages. After each passage, you will find some items based on the passage. Read the passage carefully and answer the items based on it. You are required to select your answers based solely on the contents of the passage and the opinion of the author, and indicate your response on the Answer Sheet accordingly.

People do not understand the nature or ramifications of most educational changes. They become involved in change voluntarily or involuntarily and in either case experience ambivalence about its meanings, form, and consequences. I have implied that there are a number of things at stake-changes in goals, skills, philosophy or beliefs, behaviour, etc. Subjectively these different aspects are experienced in a diffuse, incoherent manner. Change often is not conceived of as being multidimensional. Objectively, it is possible to clarify the meaning of an educational change by identifying and describing its separate dimensions. Ignorance of these dimensions explains a number of interesting phenomena in the field of educational changes : for example, why some people accept an innovation they do not understand; why some aspects of a change are implemented and others not; why strategies for change neglect certain essential components.

The concept of objective reality is tricky. Reality is always defined by individuals and groups. But individuals and groups interact to produce social phenomena (constitutions, laws, policies, educational change programmes), which exist outside any given individual. There is also the danger that the objective reality is only the reflection of the producers of change and thus simply a glorified version of their subjective conceptions. We can reduce this problem by following the practice of posing double questions : "What is the existing conception of reality on a given issue?" Followed quickly by "says who?"

Which of the following sums up the idea of the author?

This question was previously asked in
CDS 2 2024 Maths Question Paper (01-Sep-2024)
The correct answer is

Change has to be conceptualised collectively in its many dimensions, and dealt with objectively

Understanding Educational Change Conceptualisation

The author addresses how people often fail to comprehend the true nature or ramifications of most educational changes. This lack of understanding leads to feelings of ambivalence, where individuals experience mixed emotions about the meaning, form, and outcomes of these changes. A key point highlighted is that change is frequently perceived subjectively and in a fragmented way, rather than being recognized as multidimensional. This means that change affects various aspects of education simultaneously, such as goals, required skills, underlying philosophy, and behavioral practices. While the subjective experience can be confusing, the passage suggests that defining and describing the distinct dimensions of an educational change can help clarify its meaning more objectively. The author notes that failing to identify these dimensions is the reason behind several issues, like people accepting innovations they don't fully grasp or implementing only certain parts of a change initiative.

Analyzing Options for Summarizing the Author's Idea

To find the option that best sums up the author's perspective, let's evaluate each choice against the passage's content:

  • Option 1: Change is subjective and warrants objectivity from conceptualisation to implementation
    The passage does discuss both the subjective experience of change and the need for objective clarification. However, it also introduces a caution about "objective reality" potentially being just a reflection of the producers' subjective views. This option might present objectivity as a straightforward requirement without fully capturing the author's nuanced critique.
  • Option 2: Subjectivity cannot be ruled out by describing the main dimensions of change
    The author argues that describing dimensions helps clarify meaning and address subjective confusion objectively. This option focuses on the inability to eliminate subjectivity, whereas the author emphasizes methods to better manage and understand it through dimensional analysis.
  • Option 3: It is difficult to conceptualise the change which satisfies all sections with understanding
    While the passage mentions people's lack of understanding and ambivalence, its primary focus is not on the difficulty of satisfying everyone. The core argument revolves around how to conceptualize and understand the change itself by breaking it down into its constituent dimensions.
  • Option 4: Change has to be conceptualised collectively in its many dimensions, and dealt with objectively
    This option strongly resonates with the author's points. The passage implies that social phenomena like educational change programs are produced through the interaction of "individuals and groups," suggesting a collective aspect in their conceptualisation. It heavily stresses the importance of identifying and describing the "many dimensions" of change to overcome ignorance and improve the process of implementation. Furthermore, the author advocates for an objective approach to analyzing the nature of these changes, even suggesting critical questioning ("says who?") to scrutinize the claimed "objective reality," thus ensuring the change is dealt with objectively and rigorously.

Key Takeaways on Handling Educational Change

The author's perspective emphasizes a structured approach to educational change:

  • Recognizing the multidimensional nature of educational changes is crucial for proper understanding.
  • Breaking down changes into their specific dimensions is a practical method for clarification.
  • An objective approach, involving critical inquiry into the sources of information ("says who?"), is necessary to avoid simply accepting subjective viewpoints.
  • The process of creating and understanding social phenomena like educational programs often involves interaction among groups, implying a need for collective conceptualisation or at least shared understanding.
  • Addressing the complexities of change requires acknowledging both the subjective experiences of individuals and the need for objective analysis of its various components.
Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. The general tone of the passage is

  2. The use of machines has failed to bring us

  3. According to the passage, our civilization would be made greater

  4. Plastic has distressing effects on

  5. According to the passage, how do we use the powers bestowed upon us by science?

  6. According to the passage, which one of the following descriptions about machines is true?
  7. The word 'clogging' in the passage means
  8. Plastic and plastic particles can be found
  9. Plastic pollution appears to be

  10. Plastic is considered an essential commodity because


Important Questions from Reading Comprehension

  1. What best describes bulimia?

  2. When an activity requires too much effort we feel:

  3. What kind of attitude does the writer advocate for a life of fulfilment?

  4. Why did the young lady approach the piano teacher for music lessons?

  5. What does 'bread making' attitude consist of?

Need Expert Advice?
Upcoming Exams
NDA
September 13, 2026
CDS
September 13, 2026
Test Series
CDS img
Defence
UPSC CDS 2026 Mock Test Series
540 Tests 4 Tests Free
1131 Attempts
4.3(168)
English, Hindi
More Questions from CDS

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App