Which of the following statements is true?
All immunogens are antigens but all antigens are not immunogens.
In the field of immunology, the terms antigen and immunogen are often used, but they have distinct meanings. Understanding the difference is key to comprehending immune responses.
Let's define each term:
Based on these definitions, we can analyze the relationship between antigens and immunogens.
For a substance to induce an immune response (be an immunogen), it must first be recognized and bound by immune cells or their receptors. This recognition and binding property is the definition of an antigen.
Therefore, any substance that is an immunogen must inherently also be an antigen because it binds to immune receptors.
However, not all antigens are immunogens. Some molecules can bind to antibodies or T-cell receptors but are not capable of triggering a full immune response. These substances are antigens but not immunogens.
For example, small molecules called haptens are antigens because they can bind to antibodies, but they usually cannot induce antibody production on their own. They need to be attached to a larger carrier molecule to become immunogenic.
So, the relationship can be summarized as:
Considering the given options:
Thus, the statement "All immunogens are antigens but all antigens are not immunogens" is the correct description of the relationship between these terms.
The ration (daily food requirement) for broilers is protein rich with adequate fat. The level of ____ is kept high in the poultry feeds.
Varicella virus causes.
Syphilis is caused by which of the following bacterium ?
Which of the following is not an RNA virus?