The question asks to identify the correct statement concerning agreements and the concept of impossibility.
The core principle here relates to the validity of agreements based on the possibility of performing the agreed-upon act. According to contract law principles (often derived from statutes like the Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 56), certain types of agreements are inherently invalid from the start.
Based on the analysis, the only statement that accurately represents a fundamental rule of contract law regarding impossibility is that agreements whose subject matter involves an act impossible in itself are void.
A contract is said to be discharged by rescission:
A. When terms of a contract are altered
B. When a party makes novation of a contract
C. When an aggrieved party exercises his option to avoid the contract
D. When a party to a contract waives his rights under the contract
E. Where none of the parties has performed its part for a long time and no other party has objected against it
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following statements are TRUE in a contractual capacity?
A. Law presumes that every person is competent to contract unless otherwise proved
B. That a minor can make a contract for necessities of life
C. That a person of unsound mind can enter into the family contracts
D. A convict cannot enter into a valid contract nor can sue
E. That a wife can always make valid business contracts and bind her husband
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: