Which of the following statements is necessarily true for a commutative ring R with unity?
R can have exactly two maximal ideals
This question asks about properties of commutative rings with unity, specifically focusing on the existence and number of maximal and prime ideals. A ring $R$ is commutative if $ab = ba$ for all $a, b \in R$. A ring has unity if there exists an element $1 \in R$ such that $1 \cdot a = a \cdot 1 = a$ for all $a \in R$. Ideals are special subsets of a ring that behave well with ring operations.
Let's define the types of ideals mentioned:
In a commutative ring with unity, there is a crucial relationship between maximal and prime ideals:
Also, Krull's Theorem states:
Let's examine each statement in the options based on these facts about commutative rings with unity R:
Option 1: R may have no maximal ideals.
According to Krull's Theorem, every commutative ring with unity has at least one maximal ideal. Therefore, this statement is false for any commutative ring R with unity.
Option 3: R can have one or more maximal ideals but no prime ideals.
We know that every maximal ideal in a commutative ring with unity is also a prime ideal. Since a commutative ring with unity must have at least one maximal ideal, it must also have at least one prime ideal. Therefore, this statement is false for any commutative ring R with unity.
Option 4: R has at least two prime ideals.
Consider a field, like the rational numbers $\mathbb{Q}$ or the real numbers $\mathbb{R}$. A field is a commutative ring with unity. The only ideals in a field are the zero ideal $\{0\}$ and the field itself. The zero ideal $\{0\}$ is a maximal ideal (because $R/\{0\} \cong R$, which is a field, and $R$ is not the zero ring) and thus also a prime ideal. $R$ is not a proper ideal. So, a field has exactly one maximal ideal (the zero ideal) and exactly one prime ideal (the zero ideal). Therefore, it is not necessarily true that R has at least two prime ideals. This statement is false for fields.
Option 2: R can have exactly two maximal ideals.
While the question asks what is "necessarily true", given that options 1, 3, and 4 are demonstrably false for *any* or *some* commutative rings with unity, this option states something that *can* be true. Consider the ring of integers modulo 6, $\mathbb{Z}_6$. This is a commutative ring with unity. The ideals of $\mathbb{Z}_6$ are $(0)$, $(2)=\{0, 2, 4\}$, $(3)=\{0, 3\}$, and $(1)=\{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}=\mathbb{Z}_6$. The proper ideals are $(0)$, $(2)$, and $(3)$.
Thus, $\mathbb{Z}_6$ has exactly two maximal ideals: $(2)$ and $(3)$. This shows that it is possible for a commutative ring with unity to have exactly two maximal ideals. Since options 1, 3, and 4 are not necessarily true (indeed, 1 and 3 are necessarily false, and 4 is false for fields), the statement that R can have exactly two maximal ideals is the only one that represents a possible scenario for a commutative ring with unity among the choices, and is thus the most likely intended correct answer in this context.
Based on the analysis, options 1 and 3 are necessarily false for any commutative ring with unity. Option 4 is false for fields (which are commutative rings with unity). Option 2 describes a property that is possible for a commutative ring with unity (e.g., $\mathbb{Z}_6$). Therefore, among the given statements, "R can have exactly two maximal ideals" is the only one that can be true for a commutative ring with unity.
If the ring R is a commutative ring with unity, then the polynomial ring R[X] is-
Let R = (Z2 × Z2, +,.) forms a ring of module 2 such that (a, b) + (c, d) = (a + c, d + d) and (a, b) (c. d) = (a.c, b.d) for (a, b), (c, d) ∈ Z2 × Z2 then-
The set of all units in a ring R with unity forms ______.
Let C[0, 1] be the ring of all real valued continuous function on [0, 1].
Let A = {f ∈ C[0, 1] ∶ \(f\left( \frac{1}{4}\right)=f\left( \frac{3}{4}\right)\) = 0}. Then which of the following statements are true?
Which of the following statements is NOT true?