The ‘field view’ of caste examines the practical, empirical, and often localized realities of caste in India, moving beyond purely textual or normative understandings (like the varna system). It focuses on how caste operates in everyday life, including social mobility, power dynamics, and regional variations.
Let's analyze the provided statements in the context of the ‘field view’:
This statement aligns with the field view. Sanskritization, as studied empirically by sociologists like M.N. Srinivas, describes how lower castes could adopt the customs, rituals, and beliefs of higher castes to improve their social status. This highlights caste mobility and change as observed in the 'field', rather than a static structure.
This statement also reflects the field view. The concept of the ‘dominant caste’ emerged from fieldwork and emphasized that power in a village (economic, political, numerical strength) might belong to a caste that wasn't necessarily the highest in the ritualistic varna hierarchy. This empirical finding directly challenged the rigid, textual varna system and is a key aspect of the field view.
The other statements represent a more static or generalized view, contrary to the empirical focus of the field view:
The field view emphasizes significant regional variations and local specificities in caste practices and hierarchies.
While the caste system is ancient, the field view acknowledges its dynamic nature, adaptations, and changes over time, rather than portraying it as completely static.
Therefore, statements highlighting empirical processes like group mobility (Sanskritization) and the practical distribution of power (dominant caste) best illustrate the ‘field view’ of caste.
Match the following authors in Column I with their books on caste in Column II.
| Column I | Column II | ||
| Author | Book | ||
| M | Mukul Sharma | 1 | Caste Pride |
| N | Joel Lee | 2 | Deceptive Majority |
| O | Manoj Mitta | 3 | The Oxford Handbook of Caste |
| P | Surinder Jodhka | 4 | Caste and Nature |
Match the following scholars in Column I and their contributions in Column II.
| Column I | Column II | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scholar | Contribution | ||
| M | Prem Chowdhry | 1 | Dalit feminist standpoint position |
| N | Sharmila Rege | 2 | Yuganta |
| O | Irawati Karve | 3 | Gender and land rights in South Asia |
| P | Beena Agarwal | 4 | Caste and gender formation in Haryana |
Which of the following proposition(s) is/are part of the argument that B. R. Ambedkar makes in his Caste in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development