Nagpur Session 1920: Key Resolutions and Decisions

The Nagpur session of the Indian National Congress, held in December 1920, was a pivotal event in India's struggle for independence. It marked a significant shift in the Congress's direction and organizational structure. Several important resolutions were passed, and key decisions were made during this session.

Analysis of Statements on Nagpur Congress 1920

Statement (i): Non-Cooperation Resolution

The first statement concerns the moving of the Non-Cooperation resolution. This resolution was indeed a major highlight of the Nagpur session. It was formally moved by Chittaranjan (C.R.) Das. This marked the Congress's official adoption of the Non-Cooperation movement, advocating for boycotts and civil disobedience against British rule, a strategy largely shaped by Mahatma Gandhi.

Statement (ii): Organizational Changes

The second statement addresses organizational reforms implemented at the Nagpur session. The session saw significant restructuring to make the Congress a more widespread and effective body. Key changes included the formation of a smaller, more agile Working Committee, consisting of 15 members, to manage the day-to-day affairs of the party. Additionally, an enlarged All-India Committee (AICC) was constituted with 350 members, aiming to ensure broader representation and participation from across the country.

Statement (iii): Opposition to the Goal of Swaraj

The third statement discusses the opposition faced regarding the goal of Swaraj. While the Nagpur session endorsed the Non-Cooperation movement and the pursuit of Swaraj, not all prominent leaders were in complete agreement with the methods or the specific interpretation of Swaraj being promoted. Leaders like Madan Mohan Malviya and Mohammed Ali Jinnah expressed reservations. Jinnah, who had already parted ways with the Congress earlier that year, disagreed with Gandhi's approach and the resolution's direction. Malaviya also had concerns about the radical nature of the Non-Cooperation movement and its implications for achieving Swaraj. Therefore, the statement that they opposed the goal of Swaraj (or the path towards it as defined by the majority) is considered historically accurate in the context of their known viewpoints at that time.

Conclusion on Nagpur Session Statements

Based on the historical records of the Nagpur session of the Indian National Congress in 1920:

• Statement (i) is true: C.R. Das moved the Non-Cooperation resolution.
• Statement (ii) is true: A Working Committee of 15 and an All-India Committee of 350 were formed.
• Statement (iii) is true: Madan Mohan Malviya and Mohammed Ali Jinnah had reservations or opposed aspects related to the goal or methods of achieving Swaraj as advocated at the session.

Since all three statements (i), (ii), and (iii) are factually correct regarding the Nagpur session, the option encompassing all of them is the accurate choice.