All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which of the following statements about the runoff coefficient value is correct?

The correct answer is A larger value for areas with low infiltration and lower for high infiltration

Runoff Coefficient Value Explanation

The runoff coefficient, often denoted by '$C$', is a fundamental concept in hydrology used to estimate the amount of surface runoff generated from a rainfall event. It represents the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff, typically expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A higher value indicates that a larger proportion of the rainfall becomes runoff, while a lower value suggests more water infiltrates into the ground or is otherwise lost.

The value of the runoff coefficient is influenced by various factors related to the characteristics of the watershed, including soil type, surface cover, slope, and the intensity and duration of rainfall. Let's analyze the given statements:

Analyzing Option 1: Soil Type Impact

This option suggests a larger runoff coefficient for sand and a lower one for clay. However, the relationship is generally the opposite. Sandy soils typically have larger particle sizes and pore spaces, allowing for higher rates of infiltration (water soaking into the ground). Higher infiltration means less surface runoff, resulting in a lower runoff coefficient.

Clay soils, conversely, have smaller particles and lower permeability, leading to reduced infiltration rates. When infiltration is low, more rainwater remains on the surface, increasing the potential for surface runoff. Therefore, clay soils are associated with a higher runoff coefficient compared to sandy soils.

Thus, the statement "A larger value for sand and lower for clay" is incorrect.

Analyzing Option 2: Infiltration Rate Impact

This statement posits that the runoff coefficient is larger for areas with low infiltration and lower for areas with high infiltration. This aligns directly with the definition and behavior of runoff.

  • Low Infiltration Areas: When the ground's ability to absorb water is limited (low infiltration), rainfall cannot easily seep into the soil. This causes a greater amount of water to accumulate on the surface and flow away as runoff. Consequently, the runoff coefficient ($C$) will be larger.
  • High Infiltration Areas: Conversely, when the ground can absorb water readily (high infiltration), a significant portion of the rainfall infiltrates the soil. This reduces the amount of water available for surface runoff. Hence, the runoff coefficient ($C$) will be lower.

This statement accurately describes the relationship between infiltration capacity and runoff generation.

Analyzing Option 3: Surface Permeability Impact

This option suggests a larger runoff coefficient for pervious surfaces and a lower one for impervious surfaces. This is the reverse of the actual relationship.

  • Impervious Surfaces: Surfaces like pavement, rooftops, and compacted soil are considered impervious or nearly impervious. They significantly restrict water infiltration. As a result, most rainfall on these surfaces becomes runoff, leading to a high runoff coefficient.
  • Pervious Surfaces: Surfaces like forests, grasslands, and uncompacted soil are pervious. They allow for substantial infiltration, reducing the amount of surface runoff. This results in a low runoff coefficient.

Therefore, the statement "A larger value for areas with pervious surface and lower for impervious surface" is incorrect.

Analyzing Option 4: Vegetation Impact

This statement claims a larger runoff coefficient for afforestation and a lower one for deforestation. This is incorrect; the presence of vegetation typically decreases the runoff coefficient.

  • Afforestation (Increased Vegetation): Forests and densely vegetated areas enhance infiltration through root systems, improve soil structure, and increase surface roughness, which slows down runoff. These factors lead to significantly lower runoff coefficients.
  • Deforestation (Reduced Vegetation): Removing vegetation cover often leads to soil compaction and reduced infiltration capacity. Exposed soil surfaces are more prone to runoff, resulting in a larger runoff coefficient.

Thus, the statement "A larger value for areas with afforestation and lower for deforestation" is incorrect.

Conclusion on Runoff Coefficient Values

Based on the analysis, the most accurate statement regarding the runoff coefficient value is that it is larger for areas with low infiltration (where less water soaks into the ground, leading to more surface flow) and lower for areas with high infiltration (where more water soaks into the ground, reducing surface flow).

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Runoff

  1. The total quantity of surface water that can be expected in a given period from a stream at the outlet of its catchment is known as ______.

  2. A 3-hour storm on a small drainage basin produced rainfall intensities of 3.5 cm/hr 4.2 cm/hr and 2.9 cm/hr in successive hours. If the surface runoff due to storm is 3 cm, then the value of ϕ-index will be:
  3. Which of the following statements is INCORRECT with regards to runoffs?

  4. Maximum surface run-off is because of

  5. Select the correct option for the given statements.

    Statement 1: Runoff is a function of precipitation, intensity, duration and its coverage.

    Statement 2: The size of catchment has a definite effect on the runoff. More the area, lesser will be the runoff.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App