Let's analyze the given rebellions to determine which one was not a resistance movement specifically against restrictions imposed by the British rulers in India. During the period of British rule, various groups across India rose in revolt against oppressive policies, economic exploitation, and administrative restrictions.

Analyzing Indian Rebellions Against British Rule

We will examine each rebellion listed in the options to understand its context and objectives:

• Faqir and Sanyasi Rebellion: This rebellion took place in Bengal and Bihar during the late 18th century. It involved displaced peasants, disbanded soldiers, and religious ascetics (Faqirs and Sanyasis) who protested against the new British economic policies, including restrictions on visiting holy places and the hardships caused by the famine of 1770. This was clearly a movement against restrictions and oppression under British rule.
• The Indigo Rebellion: Also known as the "Indigo Revolt," this was a peasant movement in Bengal in 1859. Peasants revolted against oppressive British indigo planters who forced them to cultivate indigo instead of food crops, often under unfair terms and through coercion. The movement was a direct protest against the exploitative system enforced by the British planters, who were backed by the British administration.
• Santhal Rebellion: Occurring in 1855-1856, the Santhal Rebellion was a major uprising of the Santhal people in present-day Jharkhand and West Bengal. The Santhals rebelled against the exploitation and oppression by landlords (zamindars), moneylenders, and British officials who were encroaching on their lands and imposing heavy taxes and regulations. This rebellion was a resistance against the administrative and economic restrictions and exploitation facilitated by British rule.
• Naxalbari Rebellion: The Naxalbari Rebellion is distinct from the others. It was an armed peasant uprising that began in 1967 in the Naxalbari village of West Bengal. This movement was led by communist revolutionaries and was primarily focused on agrarian issues, demanding land redistribution and challenging the existing feudal system and state power in independent India. It occurred after India gained independence from British rule (1947). Therefore, it was not a rebellion against restrictions imposed by the British rulers.

Conclusion on Rebellions Against British Rule

Based on the analysis, the Faqir and Sanyasi Rebellion, the Indigo Rebellion, and the Santhal Rebellion were all significant uprisings that occurred during the period of British rule in India and were directed against the policies, restrictions, and exploitation associated with British administration and its beneficiaries (like planters and zamindars). The Naxalbari Rebellion, however, took place decades after British rule ended and addressed post-independence agrarian issues.

Thus, the rebellion that was NOT against restrictions imposed by the British rulers was the Naxalbari Rebellion.

Revision Table: Indian Rebellions

Additional Information on Post-Independence Movements

While many revolts and movements in India's history were a response to British rule, it is important to recognize that social and political movements continued after India gained independence in 1947. The Naxalbari movement is an example of such a post-independence uprising, rooted in the socio-economic conditions and inequalities prevalent in the country. These later movements addressed different issues compared to the anti-colonial struggles.