Which of the following is unfavourable for economic bridge construction?
The rock foundation is available at 40 m depth from the ground surface.
Building a bridge involves many factors that affect the cost and feasibility. An economic bridge construction means completing the project efficiently and cost-effectively. Let's examine the given options to understand which condition would be unfavourable, meaning it would likely increase the cost or complexity significantly.
We need to determine which of the listed conditions makes bridge construction less economic.
This condition is generally favourable for economic bridge construction. If an existing road is close, it reduces the need to build long approach roads or make significant diversions, saving material and labour costs.
This condition is typically unfavourable for economic bridge construction. Bridge foundations are critical structural elements that transfer the bridge's load to the ground. When the suitable bearing stratum (like rock) is located at a great depth (40 m is considered deep for standard bridge foundations), it requires deep foundation systems such as long piles, large caissons, or extensive excavation and backfill. These deep foundation methods are significantly more expensive and time-consuming compared to shallow foundations or foundations reaching rock at shallower depths. The cost increases due to longer pile lengths, specialized drilling equipment, increased labour, and complex construction procedures.
These are all favourable conditions. A narrow river requires a shorter bridge span, which reduces the amount of material needed for the superstructure. Small current velocity and mild gradient simplify construction in the riverbed, reduce the risk of scour around piers, and make temporary works (like coffer dams) easier and less expensive to build and maintain.
This condition is highly favourable for economic bridge construction. The availability of local, inexpensive labour and readily accessible construction materials (like aggregates, sand, or timber) directly reduces transportation costs and the overall project expenditure.
Comparing the options, the condition that poses a significant challenge and increases costs, making the construction less economic, is the requirement for deep foundations due to the rock being 40 m deep.
Therefore, the availability of rock foundation at a 40 m depth is unfavourable for economic bridge construction.
| Site Condition | Impact on Economy | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Existing road near site | Favourable | Reduces approach road costs. |
| Rock foundation at 40 m depth | Unfavourable | Requires expensive deep foundations (piles, caissons). |
| Narrow river, small current, mild gradient | Favourable | Shorter span, easier in-river construction, less scour risk. |
| Inexpensive labour, ample local material | Favourable | Reduces labour and material transport costs. |
Understanding what makes bridge construction economic is crucial. Here's a quick review of key factors:
Bridge foundations transfer the load of the bridge to the ground. The choice of foundation depends heavily on the soil conditions and the depth to suitable bearing material. Common types include:
The depth to a suitable foundation layer like rock is a primary determinant of the cost of the bridge substructure, and finding it very deep significantly impacts the overall economic feasibility.
Highway lighting serves which of the following purposes?
i. Prevent accidents
ii. Increase in traffic capacity
iii. Increase in safety against crime
iv. Increase green cycle time
The proposed design speed (km/h) for urban expressways as recommended by IRC is:
The rock reinforcement systems are used:
For transportation purposes in India, the first preference is given to:
The maximum scour depth dim for the condition of flow at noses of piers is