All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which of the following is a technique of self-assessment in mathematics learning?

I. Scrutiny

II. comparison

The correct answer is

Both I and II

Understanding Self-Assessment in Mathematics Learning

Self-assessment is a crucial skill for students, especially in subjects like mathematics. It involves students evaluating their own work, understanding, and progress. This process helps learners become more aware of their strengths and weaknesses, allowing them to take ownership of their learning and identify areas where they need to improve.

Several techniques can be used for self-assessment in mathematics. The question asks about two specific techniques: Scrutiny and Comparison.

Exploring Scrutiny as a Self-Assessment Technique

Scrutiny involves carefully examining or inspecting something. In the context of mathematics learning and self-assessment, scrutiny means closely reviewing one's own work. This can involve:

  • Checking each step of a calculation or problem-solving process for errors.
  • Reading through explanations or reasoning to ensure they are logical and complete.
  • Verifying that all parts of a question have been addressed.
  • Looking for potential mistakes in understanding or application of concepts.

By scrutinizing their work, students can catch mistakes before submitting it or identify misunderstandings that need clarification.

Exploring Comparison as a Self-Assessment Technique

Comparison involves looking at two or more things to find similarities or differences. In mathematics self-assessment, comparison can be used in several ways:

  • Comparing their solution to a correct example provided by the teacher or textbook.
  • Comparing their approach to problem-solving with different methods they have learned.
  • Comparing their current performance on a topic to previous attempts to see if they have improved.
  • Comparing their work against a rubric or set of criteria to see if all requirements are met.

Comparing their work helps students understand what a successful outcome looks like, identify gaps in their knowledge or skills, and learn from examples.

Conclusion: Both Scrutiny and Comparison are Valid Techniques

Both scrutiny (careful review) and comparison (checking against examples or criteria) are effective techniques for students to assess their own understanding and performance in mathematics. They empower students to take an active role in evaluating their learning process.

Therefore, both I (Scrutiny) and II (Comparison) are techniques of self-assessment in mathematics learning.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Evaluation of Mathematics - Teaching

  1. Which of the following combination is not correct?

    I. Mathematical Reasoning - Observation of Group Interactions

    II. Using mathematical knowledge to solve problems - projects and assignments

  2. Which category does this specification to build a structure or pattern from diverse element?

  3. You administered a test on Mathematics to class V, but most of the students failed it. You have to construct and administer another test. Which test would you prefer?

  4. Meaning of comprehensive evaluation in continuous and comprehensive evaluation-

  5. Which of the following is not an evaluation method?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App