Curriculum Model Analysis: Identifying a Systematic Linear Process

The question asks us to identify a specific curriculum development model based on its key characteristics: being a systematic, linear process that includes distinct stages like analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation.

Understanding Curriculum Development Models

Curriculum development models provide frameworks for planning, creating, and improving educational curricula. Different models emphasize various aspects, stages, and approaches. Understanding these models helps educators design effective learning experiences.

Evaluating the Characteristics

The core features described are:

• Systematic: Organized, methodical, and follows a logical structure.
• Linear Process: Proceeds step-by-step in a forward direction, without significant backtracking.
• Key Stages: Explicitly mentions analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation.

Analyzing the Options

Let's examine how the given models align with these characteristics:

1. Tyler's Rational Model: This is a highly influential model known for its straightforward, linear, and systematic approach. It typically involves asking four fundamental questions:

• What education purposes should the school seek to attain? (Objectives/Analysis)
• What educational experiences are likely to achieve these purposes? (Content/Design)
• How can these educational experiences be effectively organised? (Development)
• How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained? (Evaluation/Implementation)

This model directly matches the description of a systematic, linear process involving analysis, design (experiences), development (organization), and evaluation. While 'development' and 'implementation' might be implicitly covered or combined within Tyler's structure, the overall linear and systematic nature fits the description perfectly.

2. Wheeler's Circular Model: This model views curriculum development as a continuous, dynamic cycle rather than a strictly linear path. It emphasizes ongoing refinement and adaptation.

3. Walker's Model: Walker's model focuses more on the decision-making process and the "deliberative phase" involved in curriculum development, highlighting stages like problem identification, seeking solutions, and crafting a rationale. It's less focused on a purely linear sequence of analysis-design-develop-implement-evaluate.

4. Taba's Grassroots Model: Developed by Hilda Taba, this model is often contrasted with Tyler's. It emphasizes a bottom-up or inductive approach, starting with specific learning units and building towards broader curriculum goals, rather than the top-down, deductive sequence implied by the question.

Conclusion

Based on the emphasis on a systematic and linear process including analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation, Tyler's Rational Model is the best fit among the options provided. It represents a foundational, sequential approach to curriculum construction.