Which harmful social practice was banned in 1829 by Lord Bentinck during the British rule in India?
The question asks about a specific harmful social practice that was outlawed in India in the year 1829 by Lord William Bentinck, the Governor-General of the British East India Company.
The practice in question is known as Sati (also spelled Suttee). This was a historical custom where a widow immolated herself, either voluntarily or by coercion, on her deceased husband's funeral pyre. This act signified the ultimate sacrifice and devotion of a wife to her husband.
Lord William Bentinck, during his tenure as Governor-General from 1828 to 1835, took decisive steps to reform social evils prevalent in India. He is widely credited with the abolition of the Sati practice.
Let's briefly look at why the other options, while significant social issues, were not the practice banned in 1829:
Therefore, the harmful social practice banned in 1829 by Lord Bentinck was Sati.
During the colonial period, India's industrial development was the result of British policies. Which of the following options best describes the nature of industrial development in India at the eve of independence?