Which among the following countries have no written constitution?
Understanding Written and Unwritten Constitutions
A constitution is a set of fundamental principles according to which a state is governed. Constitutions can broadly be classified as written or unwritten.
- Written Constitution: This is a constitution that is contained in a single, supreme document or a series of documents formally enacted as constitutional law. Most countries in the world have written constitutions.
- Unwritten Constitution: This type of constitution is not codified into a single document. Instead, it is derived from various sources such as statutes, conventions, judicial decisions, and historical practices. While often called 'unwritten', parts of it are indeed written down in different laws and documents.
The question asks which of the given countries has no written constitution, meaning which country does not have a single, codified document serving as its primary constitution.
Analyzing the Options
Let's examine each country listed in the options:
- Australia: Australia has a written constitution, the Constitution of Australia, which came into effect on 1 January 1901.
- New Zealand: New Zealand does not have a single, codified written constitution. Its constitutional framework is found in a collection of statutes (like the Constitution Act 1986, Bill of Rights Act 1990, and Electoral Act 1993), treaties (like the Treaty of Waitangi), judicial decisions, prerogative instruments, and constitutional conventions. While many elements are written, they are not gathered into one supreme constitutional document.
- Spain: Spain has a written constitution, the Spanish Constitution of 1978, which was ratified in 1978 and came into effect later that year.
- France: France has a written constitution, the Constitution of the Fifth Republic, adopted in 1958. France has had several written constitutions throughout its history.
Identifying the Country with No Written Constitution
Based on the analysis, New Zealand is the country among the options that does not have a single, comprehensive written constitution document. Its constitutional system is based on a variety of written and unwritten sources.
Conclusion
Therefore, the country among the options with no written constitution is New Zealand.
Revision Table: Constitutional Systems
| Country | Type of Constitution | Key Characteristic |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | Written | Single codified document (Constitution of Australia) |
| New Zealand | Unwritten (or uncodified) | Constitution derived from statutes, conventions, judicial decisions, etc.; not a single document |
| Spain | Written | Single codified document (Spanish Constitution of 1978) |
| France | Written | Single codified document (Constitution of the Fifth Republic) |
Additional Information on Unwritten Constitutions
The term "unwritten constitution" can be slightly misleading, as parts of such constitutions are indeed written down (e.g., statutes). A more accurate term might be "uncodified constitution." The United Kingdom is another well-known example of a country with an uncodified constitution, similar in nature to New Zealand's constitutional system. In systems with uncodified constitutions, the fundamental rules are more flexible and can evolve over time through parliamentary acts, judicial rulings, and the development of conventions.
Important Questions from Polity
In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India directed that every protected forest, national park and wildlife sanctuary across the country should have a mandatory eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of a minimum of
Which one of the following Directive Principles was inserted by the Constitution (42 nd Amendment) Act, 1976?
A common High Court for two or more states can be established by:
Which one among the following is not a Fundamental Right under the Constitution of India?
The Central Vigilance Commission was established on the recommendation of which one of the following Committees?
