Who among the following classical Indian philosophers could be credited with such reasoning?
The question describes a method of understanding the meaning of a word, like 'table', by distinguishing it from everything else in the universe of discourse. This process involves identifying what a concept *is not* to understand what it *is*.
This reasoning aligns directly with the Buddhist philosopher Diṅnāga (circa 5th century CE) and his influential theory of apoha (meaning 'exclusion' or 'negation').
Therefore, Diṅnāga is the philosopher credited with this reasoning based on the principle of exclusion for understanding meaning.
| Income range (Rs.) | Tax slab (Rs.) |
| 0 to 5000 | 2% of income |
| Greater than 5000 to 10000 | 100 + 3% of income over 5000 |
| Greater than 10000 to 20000 | 250 + 5% of income over 10000 |
| Greater than 20000 to 30000 | 750 + 8% of income over 20000 |
| Greater than 30000 to 50000 | 1550 + 10% of income over 30000 |
| Greater than 50000 to 100000 | 3550 + 20% of income over 50000 |
Identify the title of the poem in which the following lines appear:
"He was found by the Bureau of Statistics to be
One against whom there was no official complaint,
And all the reports on his conduct agree
That, in the modern sense of an old-fashioned word, he was a saint
For in everything he did he served the greater community."