The concept of Intentional Fallacy is a significant idea in literary theory, particularly associated with the New Critics like W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley.
The Intentional Fallacy refers to the mistake made when a reader or critic attempts to determine the meaning of a literary work by focusing on the author's supposed intention or plan in creating the work. According to New Criticism, the meaning of a poem, play, or any literary text should be derived solely from the text itself – its words, structure, and form. Evidence about the author's personal beliefs, historical context, or intended message is considered irrelevant and potentially misleading when interpreting the work's artistic merit and meaning.
Let's look at why the other options are not the correct definition of Intentional Fallacy:
Therefore, the most accurate definition of Intentional Fallacy is the error that arises from trying to ascertain or rely on the writer's intention when interpreting a literary piece.
| List-I | List-II |
| Electronic Configuration | First Ionisation energy (kJ mol$^{-1}$) |
| (A). ns$^2$ | (I). 2100 |
| (B). ns$^2$np$^1$ | (II). 1400 |
| (C). ns$^2$np$^3$ | (III). 800 |
| (D). ns$^2$np$^6$ | (IV). 900 |
| List-I | List-II |
| Spectroscopy | Property |
| (A). Raman | (I). Polarizability |
| (B). FTIR | (II). Dipole Moment |
| (C). UV-Visible | (III). Absorbance |
| (D). NMR | (IV). Spin |