All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

To investigate the relationship between microtubules and centrioles in fixed HeLa cells using an epifluorescence microscope, a researcher plans to conduct immunostaining using antibodies against tubulin and centrin (centriolar protein). After the incubation with the primary antibodies and wash, she/he plans to use secondary antibodies that bind to the primary antibodies. Below is a list of secondary antibodies carrying various fluorophores (dyes) available to the researcher.

A. Alexa 568

B. FITC

C. Alexa 488

D. Alexa 647

Select the correct combinations of the appropriate dyes that the researcher would typically utilize to observe co‐localization in an epifluorescence microscope?

The correct answer is

A and C

Understanding how different components within a cell are located relative to each other is crucial in cell biology. One common technique to study this is co-localization using immunofluorescence microscopy. This involves staining two different proteins with antibodies linked to different fluorescent dyes and then observing their positions within the cell using a microscope.

In this scenario, a researcher wants to investigate the relationship between microtubules and centrioles in HeLa cells. They plan to stain microtubules using antibodies against tubulin and centrioles using antibodies against centrin. The primary antibodies are then detected using fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies.

For co-localization studies using an epifluorescence microscope, it is essential to use secondary antibodies labeled with fluorescent dyes that have distinct emission spectra. This means the light they emit when excited should be in different wavelength ranges so that the signals from the two proteins can be captured separately using appropriate filters on the microscope. If the emission spectra significantly overlap, it becomes difficult to distinguish between the two signals, making co-localization analysis unreliable.

Choosing Appropriate Fluorescent Dyes

The researcher has a list of secondary antibodies carrying different fluorophores:

  • A. Alexa 568
  • B. FITC
  • C. Alexa 488
  • D. Alexa 647

Let's consider the typical emission ranges for these dyes:

  • FITC and Alexa 488 are green dyes, typically emitting light around 520 nm when excited by blue light (~488 nm).
  • Alexa 568 is an orange/red dye, typically emitting light around 580-600 nm when excited by green light (~561 nm).
  • Alexa 647 is a far-red dye, typically emitting light around 665-670 nm when excited by red light (~633 or 647 nm).

For co-localization, we need two dyes whose emission spectra are separated enough to be distinguished by the microscope's filters. Let's look at the combinations from the options:

  • B and C (FITC and Alexa 488): Both are green dyes with very similar emission spectra. Their signals would heavily overlap, making it impossible to distinguish between tubulin and centrin staining. This combination is unsuitable for co-localization.
  • C and D (Alexa 488 and Alexa 647): Alexa 488 emits in the green range (~520 nm), and Alexa 647 emits in the far-red range (~665-670 nm). These emission spectra are well-separated, making this a suitable combination for two-color imaging and co-localization.
  • A and D (Alexa 568 and Alexa 647): Alexa 568 emits in the orange/red range (~580-600 nm), and Alexa 647 emits in the far-red range (~665-670 nm). While these are somewhat separated, the separation might be less pronounced than with Alexa 488 and Alexa 647, depending on the filter sets used. It can still be a usable combination.
  • A and C (Alexa 568 and Alexa 488): Alexa 488 emits in the green range (~520 nm), and Alexa 568 emits in the orange/red range (~580-600 nm). These two emission spectra are sufficiently separated to be resolved using standard filter sets in an epifluorescence microscope. This combination is very commonly used for two-color immunofluorescence and co-localization studies.

Co-localization Using Alexa 488 and Alexa 568

The combination of Alexa 488 and Alexa 568 allows the researcher to visualize the distribution of tubulin and centrin separately. The microscope would use different filter sets:

  • A filter set optimized for Alexa 488 (excitation bandpass filter around 480 nm, emission bandpass filter around 520 nm) to capture the signal from the tubulin antibody.
  • A filter set optimized for Alexa 568 (excitation bandpass filter around 560 nm, emission bandpass filter around 585-610 nm) to capture the signal from the centrin antibody.

By capturing images using these different filter sets and then overlaying them, the researcher can see if the green signal (tubulin) and the red signal (centrin) overlap, indicating co-localization of microtubules and centrioles.

The combination of Alexa 488 (C) and Alexa 568 (A) provides distinct signals suitable for observing co-localization in epifluorescence microscopy.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Histochemical and Immunotechniques

  1. For a given immunological application [column X], select the type of antibody [column Y] that should be used:

    Column XColumn Y
    ABacterial agglutination(i)Only monoclonal
    BWestern blotting(ii)Only polyclonal
    CDetection of a cytokine using a solid phase ELISA(iii)Either monoclonal or
    polyclonal
    DDiagnostic tissue typing
    Choose the option with correct matches between terms of Columns X and Y.
  2. In the enzyme-linked antibody used in ELISA, the interaction between the enzyme and antibody is stabilized by

  3. A researcher raised antibodies against sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) and purified the IgG fraction. Some of the IgG antibodies were then subjected to enzymatic digestion to have Fab, Fc and F(ab’)2 fractions. He placed each preparation in a separate tube ( 1 to 3), labeled the three tubes to indicate their contents, and incubated them on ice. After a while he noticed that the label on two of the tubes (1 and 2) had gotten erased. He did a test for tube 1 and found that the preparation in the tube agglutinated SRBCs but did not lyse them in presence of complement. Which preparation was in tube 1?

  4. PBMCs from the blood collected from a tuberculosis (TB) patient were given to four lab technicians to perform ELISPOT assay for interferon γ (IFNγ). While all steps recommended for ELISPOT were followed, the first step was performed differently by the four lab technicians, as detailed below.

    A Lab technician 1 coated each well with 250.000 formaldehyde- treated cells and stimulated the cells with TB-specific antigen.

    B. Lab technician 2 coated each well with 250,000 cells and did not stimulate the cells with TB-specific antigen.

    C. Lab technician 3 depleted T cells from PBMCs completely, coated the wells with monocyte-enriched PBMCs, and stimulated them with TB-specific antigen.

    D. Lab technician 4 coated each well with 250.000 cells and stimulated the cells with TB-specific antigens.

    Which of the lab technicians assays will yield a correct ELISPOT result for interferon γ?

  5. An anti-idiotypic antibody with fluorescent tag was used for detection of immune cells in tissue sections from a healthy individual specifically by cell surface labeling. Which of the following will have the highest chances of getting detected?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App