All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

The term for universal concomitance in Indian Logic is :

The correct answer is
Vyapti

Understanding Universal Concomitance in Indian Logic

Indian Logic, particularly within the Nyaya school, is concerned with valid reasoning and inference. A key concept in establishing a valid inference is understanding the relationship between different terms.

The Concept of Universal Concomitance

The question asks for the specific term used in Indian Logic to describe universal concomitance. This concept refers to an invariable and unconditional connection between two things. In the context of logical arguments, it signifies a relationship where the presence or absence of one thing (the middle term or 'hetu') necessarily implies the presence or absence of another thing (the major term or 'sadhya'). This inseparable link is fundamental for drawing a correct conclusion.

Analyzing the Options

Let's examine the given terms from Indian Logic:

  • Hetu: This is the middle term or the reason/ground upon which an inference is based. For example, in the inference "There is fire because there is smoke," 'smoke' is the hetu.
  • Drishtanta: This refers to an example or the illustrative instance used to establish the relationship between the hetu and the sadhya. It helps in demonstrating the concomitance.
  • Sadhya: This is the major term or the proposition to be proved; the predicate of the conclusion. In the example above, 'fire' is the sadhya.
  • Vyapti: This term denotes the universal, inseparable, and essential connection or constant conjunction between the hetu (middle term) and the sadhya (major term). It signifies the rule of inference, meaning that wherever the hetu exists, the sadhya must also exist. This perfectly matches the definition of universal concomitance.

Identifying the Correct Term

Based on the definitions, Vyapti is the precise term for universal concomitance in Indian Logic. It establishes the necessary link that allows one to infer the presence of the sadhya from the presence of the hetu.

For instance, the relationship between smoke (hetu) and fire (sadhya) is one of universal concomitance: wherever there is smoke, there is fire. This invariable connection is vyapti.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Indian Logic

  1. Given below are two statements:

    Statement I: According to Classical Indian Logicians (Naiyāyikas) the inference from the effect of the cause is called Purvāvāt.

    Statement II: According to Naiyāyikas the inference of cause from the effect is not possible.

    In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. Given below are two statements : One is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R):

    Assertion (A) : The Naiya̅yikas did not give separate treatment of the inductive methods, as the western logicians have done.

    Reasons (R) : According to Nyya school universal propostions are obtained from perception itself by one of the forms of extra-ordinary perception.

    In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  3. According to the classical Indian School of Logic which of the following steps of inference involve the application of the universal concomitance to the present case?

    (A) This hill has a fire

    (B) Because it has smoke

    (C) Whatever has smoke has fire, e.g. an oven

    (D) This hill has smoke which is invariably associated with fire

    (E) Therefore the hill has a fire

    Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

  4. Given below are two statements

    Statement I: According to Classical Indian School of Logic, the method of induction is used to affirm the major premise, since generality or universality cannot be perceived.

    Statement II: Classical Indian Logicians give separate treatment of the inductive method.

    In light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below

  5. Which of the following are admitted by the Naiyayikas (Indian Logicians) as kinds of Inferences?

    (A) Inference of the effect from the cause

    (B) Inference of the cause from the effect

    (C) Inference from knowledge of similarity between two kinds of objects

    (D) Inference from observation for general inseparability

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App