The set of attributes shared by all and only those objects to which a general term refers, is called : (A) The intension of that term (B) Connotation of that term (C) The extension of that term (D) Denotation of that term Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
The question asks about the set of attributes shared by all and only those objects to which a general term refers. This concept is fundamental in logic and semantics when defining the meaning of terms.
Let's break down the options provided:
The question specifically asks for the "set of attributes shared by all and only those objects". This phrasing directly describes the defining properties that determine membership in the set of objects referred to by the term. This is precisely what the intension (or connotation) of a term represents.
To illustrate the difference between intension/connotation and extension/denotation, consider the term "triangle":
Based on the definitions, the set of attributes shared by all and only those objects to which a general term refers is known as the intension of that term and also the connotation of that term (in a logical context). The extension and denotation refer to the objects themselves, not the shared attributes.
Therefore, the correct concepts describing the set of shared attributes are Intension and Connotation.
| Term | Refers To | Example (for "dog") |
|---|---|---|
| Intension | Set of defining attributes/properties | Mammal, canine, barks, four legs |
| Connotation | Set of associated/implied attributes (logical use) | Same as intension |
| Extension | Set of all actual objects the term applies to | All individual dogs in the world |
| Denotation | Objects the term refers to | Same as extension |
The question asks for the set of attributes, which aligns with Intension and Connotation.
The set of attributes shared by all and only those objects to which a general term refers is called the intension of that term and the connotation of that term.
| Concept | Focus | What it Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Intension / Connotation | Meaning, Definition, Properties | What is it? What are its defining characteristics? |
| Extension / Denotation | Instances, Objects, Referents | What things are it? Which objects belong to the set? |
In formal logic and semantics, the distinction between intension and extension is crucial for understanding how terms acquire meaning and how truth values are assigned to statements. A term's intension determines its extension. If the intension changes, the set of objects it applies to (extension) will also likely change.
For instance, if the definition (intension) of "fish" was changed to include whales, the set of objects considered "fish" (extension) would expand. Conversely, if the definition became more specific, the extension might shrink.
While connotation in everyday language can include subjective or emotional associations (e.g., "home" connotes warmth and security), its use in logic often mirrors the precise, defining attributes of intension.
Consider the following example given below:
Devadatta is growing fat.
He does not eat food during the day.
Therefore, he must be eating food during the night, other things being equal.
Identify the logic involved in the example provided above by choosing the correct
answer from the options given below:
Assumption of an unperceived fact in order to reconcile two apparently inconsistent perceived facts is known in Indian Logic as:
Anil's participation in the classroom is indifferent. His parents do not find him to be active either. But his performance in examinations ranges from being good to outstanding. Therefore, he must be studying privately in a clandestine way. This is an example of which kind of Pramana?
The knowing self knows objects through the instrumentality of the sense organs (Indriyas) but the existence of Indriya is proved by
Which one of the following sources of knowledge (pramana) in classical Indian Philosophy is based on similarity of the unobserved object with a known object?