In quality control and testing, the reliability number is a measure used in a sampling process to estimate the performance or durability of a batch of units based on testing a sample. It essentially indicates the likelihood that a unit from the sample, and by extension from the batch, will perform without failure under specified conditions.
When performing a sampling process, we test a certain number of units from a larger batch. During this testing, some units might fail; these are referred to as defective units. The reliability of the sample (and the estimated reliability of the batch) is inversely related to the number of defective units found.
Reliability is typically expressed as a percentage, representing the proportion of units that are expected to be non-defective or functional. If we know the total number of units tested and the number of defective units found, we can calculate the proportion of defective units:
Proportion of defective units = $\frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}$
The proportion of non-defective units is 1 minus the proportion of defective units:
Proportion of non-defective units = $1 - \frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}$
To express this proportion as a percentage (the reliability number), we multiply by 100:
Reliability (%) = $\left(1 - \frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}\right) \times 100$
Expanding this, we get:
Reliability (%) = $1 \times 100 - \left(\frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}\right) \times 100$
Reliability (%) = $100 - \left(\frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}\right) \times 100$
Let's compare the derived formula for the reliability number with the given options:
100 + [Number of defective units / Number of units tested] × 100: This formula adds the percentage of defective units to 100, which would result in a reliability greater than 100% if any defects are found, or exactly 100% if no defects are found. This does not correctly represent reliability, which should decrease as defective units increase.100 - [Number of defective units / Number of units tested] + 100: This formula is not standard for calculating a percentage of non-defective units. It doesn't correctly relate the number of defects to a percentage out of 100.100 - [Number of defective units / Number of units tested] × 100: This formula subtracts the percentage of defective units from 100. This precisely matches our derived formula for reliability percentage. If there are no defective units, the term being subtracted is 0, resulting in 100% reliability. If all units are defective, the term is 100, resulting in 0% reliability. This correctly reflects the concept of reliability based on defects.100 + [Number of defective units / Number of units tested] - 100: This formula simplifies to just [Number of defective units / Number of units tested]. This represents the proportion of defective units, not the reliability (proportion of non-defective units) expressed as a percentage.Based on this analysis, the formula that correctly represents the reliability number in a sampling process is the one that subtracts the percentage of defective units from 100.
The reliability number, often expressed as a percentage in a sampling process, is calculated by taking 100% and subtracting the percentage of units found to be defective during testing. The formula that represents this is:
\(\text{Reliability Number} = 100 - \left(\frac{\text{Number of defective units}}{\text{Number of units tested}}\right) \times 100\)
| Concept | Explanation | Relevance to Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling Process | Testing a subset (sample) of a larger group (batch) to infer properties of the whole group. | Reliability is estimated based on the sample results. |
| Number of Units Tested | The total count of items examined in the sample. | Forms the denominator in the defect proportion calculation. |
| Defective Units | Items in the sample that fail to meet specified requirements during testing. | Higher number of defective units leads to lower reliability. |
| Reliability Number | A quantitative measure (often percentage) of the likelihood of an item performing its intended function without failure. | Calculated using the formula involving total units tested and defective units found. |
While the formula provides a way to calculate reliability from sample data, several factors influence the accuracy and confidence in this estimate:
Consider the following types of vehicles:
I. Full battery electric vehicles
II. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles
III. Fuel cell electric hybrid vehicles
How many of the above are considered as alternative powertrain vehicles?
With reference to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), consider the following statements:
I. All types of UAVs can do vertical landing.
II. All types of UAVs can do automated hovering.
III. All types of UAVs can use battery only as a source of power supply.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
In the context of electric vehicle batteries, consider the following elements:
I. Cobalt
II. Graphite
III. Lithium
IV. Nickel
How many of the above usually make up battery cathodes?
Consider the following:
I. Cigarette butts
II. Eyeglass lenses
III. Car tyres
How many of them contain plastic?
Consider the following substances:
I. Ethanol
II. Nitroglycerine
III. Urea
Coal gasification technology can be used in the production of how many of them?