Understanding Locus Standi Liberalization
The question asks which case liberalized the rule of locus standi, which determines who has the right to approach a court.
Key Case and Its Impact
The principle of locus standi was significantly liberalized by the Supreme Court in the case of:
- S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981): This landmark judgment is widely recognized for broadening the scope of who can move the court. It allowed any public-spirited citizen or social action group, acting in good faith, to approach the courts for redressing a public wrong or injury, even if they were not directly affected. This paved the way for the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India.
Other mentioned cases:
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India: Primarily dealt with the scope of Article 356 (President's Rule).
- Minerva Mills v. Union of India: Dealt with the basic structure doctrine and the interdependence of fundamental rights and Directive Principles.
- Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala: Established the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
Therefore, the S.P. Gupta v. Union of India case is the correct answer as it specifically addressed and liberalized the criteria for locus standi.
Important Questions from Judiciary-Supreme Court & High Courts
With reference to India, consider the following statements :
1. Government law officers and legal firms are recognised as advocates, but corporate lawyers and patent attorneys are excluded from recognition as advocates.
2. Bar Councils have the power to lay down the rules relating to legal education and recognition of law colleges.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Which one of the following statements is not correct?
(a) The Supreme Court of India is a Court of Record.
(b) High Courts in India are Courts of Record.
(c) Subordinate Courts in India are Courts of Record.
(d) All Courts in India are not Courts of Record.Consider the following pairs :
1. Enlargement of Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: Article 138A of Constitution of India.
2. Conferment on the Supreme Court of powers to issue certain writs : Article 139A of Constitution of India.
3. Civil and judicial authority to act in aid of the Supreme Court : Article 144A of the Constitution of India.
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
- Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy of the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium of Judges in the appointment and transfer of the higher judiciary?
- Which one of the following powers of the Supreme Court is also conferred on a High Court?
