The equilibrium constant for the formation of the complex \(\rm Zn (NH_3)_4^{2+}\) at 25°C is close to: [Given: \(\rm E^0_{Zn^{+2}/Zn}=-0.763V\) and \(\rm E^0_{Zn(NH_3)^{+2}_4/Zn,NH_3}=-1.03V\)]
1 × 109
The question asks us to find the equilibrium constant (\(K_{eq}\)) for the formation of the complex ion \(\rm Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\) at 25°C, given the standard electrode potentials (\(E^0\)) for two half-reactions involving zinc.
The formation reaction for the complex \(\rm Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\) from the simple ion \(\rm Zn^{2+}\) and ammonia (\(\rm NH_3\)) is:
\(\rm Zn^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 4NH_3\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\text{(aq)}\)
We are given the following standard reduction potentials:
To find the equilibrium constant for the formation reaction, we need to relate it to a standard cell potential (\(E^0_{cell}\)). The formation reaction can be obtained by combining the two given half-reactions. Specifically, we can reverse the second reaction and add the first reaction:
Reverse the second reaction (Oxidation half-reaction):
\(\rm Zn\text{(s)} + 4NH_3\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2e^-\); \(E^0_{oxidation} = -E^0_2 = -(-1.03 \text{ V}) = +1.03 \text{ V}\)
Keep the first reaction (Reduction half-reaction):
\(\rm Zn^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons Zn\text{(s)}\); \(E^0_{reduction} = E^0_1 = -0.763 \text{ V}\)
Adding these two half-reactions gives the overall reaction for complex formation:
\(\rm Zn^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \cancel{Zn\text{(s)}} + 4NH_3\text{(aq)} + \cancel{2e^-} \rightleftharpoons \cancel{Zn\text{(s)}} + Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\text{(aq)} + \cancel{2e^-}\)
Simplified overall reaction:
\(\rm Zn^{2+}\text{(aq)} + 4NH_3\text{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\text{(aq)}\)
The standard cell potential for this overall reaction is calculated as:
\(E^0_{cell} = E^0_{reduction} - E^0_{oxidation}\)
\(E^0_{cell} = E^0_1 - E^0_2\)
\(E^0_{cell} = (-0.763 \text{ V}) - (-1.03 \text{ V})\)
\(E^0_{cell} = -0.763 \text{ V} + 1.03 \text{ V}\)
\(E^0_{cell} = 0.267 \text{ V}\)
The number of electrons transferred in this reaction is \(n=2\).
At 25°C (298 K), the standard cell potential is related to the equilibrium constant (\(K_{eq}\)) by the equation:
\(E^0_{cell} = \frac{0.0591}{n} \log K_{eq}\)
We can rearrange this equation to solve for \(\log K_{eq}\):
\(\log K_{eq} = \frac{n \times E^0_{cell}}{0.0591}\)
Now, substitute the values:
\(\log K_{eq} = \frac{2 \times 0.267 \text{ V}}{0.0591}\)
\(\log K_{eq} = \frac{0.534}{0.0591}\)
\(\log K_{eq} \approx 9.0355\)
To find \(K_{eq}\), we take the antilogarithm:
\(K_{eq} = 10^{9.0355}\)
\(K_{eq} = 10^{0.0355} \times 10^9\)
\(K_{eq} \approx 1.085 \times 10^9\)
Comparing this calculated value with the given options:
2 \(\times 10^8\)
5.5 \(\times 10^{10}\)
1 \(\times 10^9\)
6.6 \(\times 10^7\)
The calculated equilibrium constant, \(1.085 \times 10^9\), is closest to the option \(1 \times 10^9\).
The large value of \(K_{eq}\) indicates that the formation of the \(\rm Zn(NH_3)_4^{2+}\) complex is highly favorable at equilibrium.
The vapour pressures of water, acetone and ethanol at 293 K are 2.34 kPa, 12.36 kPa and 5.85 kPa respectively. Which of the following has the lowest boiling point?
Consider the gas phase reaction 2A(g) + 3B(g) ⇌ 2C(g) at a given temperature. When 2.0 moles of A(g) are reacted with 2.0 moles of B(g), 0.8 moles of C(g) are formed at equilibrium at a total pressure of 2.0 bar. The value of the equilibrium constant, KP of this reaction at the given temperature is closest to
The equilibrium dissociation energy of a diatomic molecule is 4.75 eV and its stretching frequency corresponds to 0.5 eV. The minimum energy required to dissociate the molecule in eV is
For the reaction N2(g) + 3H2(g) → 2NH3(g), the thermodynamic quantity which depends upon the pressure at which equilibrium is arrived at is (superscript 'o'represents standard state)
In the reaction PCl5(g) ⇌ PCl3(g) + Cl2(g), the equilibrium concentration of PCl5 and PCl3 are 0.4 and 0.2 mole/litre respectively. If the value of Kc is 0.5, what is the concentration of Cl2 in mole/litre?