The clogging of chain rings with mud introduces (with ‘error’ defined in the standard way) 1. Negative cumulative error 2. Positive cumulative error 3. Compensating error
2 only
Understanding Errors in Surveying Chain Measurement
Surveying involves measuring distances, angles, and elevations on the Earth's surface. One common method for linear measurement, especially in older techniques or for less precise work, uses a surveying chain or tape. These tools can be subject to various types of errors. The question focuses on the effect of mud clogging on surveying chain rings and the type of error it introduces.
Types of Errors in Measurement
In surveying, errors are broadly classified into two main categories:
- Systematic or Cumulative Errors: These errors occur consistently according to a specific rule and tend to accumulate over a series of measurements. They can often be determined and corrected.
- Random or Compensating Errors: These errors are accidental in nature, unpredictable in sign (positive or negative), and tend to compensate for each other over many measurements.
Based on how systematic errors affect the measurement, they can be further classified as:
- Positive Cumulative Error: Makes the measured distance greater than the true distance.
- Negative Cumulative Error: Makes the measured distance less than the true distance.
A Compensating Error falls under the random error category where positive and negative errors tend to balance out over time.
Effect of Mud Clogging on Chain Rings
A surveying chain is made up of many links joined by rings. The standard length of the chain is determined by the distance between the outside of the handles. When mud clogs the rings, it prevents the links from straightening out completely when the chain is pulled taut. This effectively reduces the actual length of the chain compared to its standard or nominal length.
Let's consider a scenario:
- Nominal length of the chain (\(L\)) = 20 meters
- Actual length of the chain due to mud (\(L'\)) < 20 meters (e.g., 19.9 meters)
- True distance to be measured (\(D\)) = 100 meters
If we use the mud-clogged chain to measure the 100-meter distance, we will apply the chain end-to-end multiple times. The number of times we need to apply the *actual* chain (\(N\)) to cover the true distance (\(D\)) is:
\(N = \frac{D}{L'}\)
Since \(L' < L\), the value of \(N\) will be greater than if we used a correct chain (\(N_{correct} = D/L\)).
The measured distance (\(M\)) is then recorded by multiplying the number of chain applications (\(N\)) by the *nominal* length of the chain (\(L\)):
\(M = N \times L = \frac{D}{L'} \times L\)
Since \(L' < L\), the ratio \(\frac{L}{L'}\) is greater than 1. Therefore,
\(M = D \times \frac{L}{L'} > D\)
The measured distance (\(M\)) is greater than the true distance (\(D\)). This difference (\(M - D\)) represents a positive error.
This error occurs every time a chain length is measured, and because the chain is consistently shorter due to mud, the error adds up with each application. Thus, it is a cumulative error, and specifically, a positive cumulative error because it makes the measured distance too large.
Analyzing the Options
Based on the analysis:
- Negative cumulative error: Incorrect, as the error makes the measured distance larger, not smaller.
- Positive cumulative error: Correct, as the shorter chain due to mud leads to measured distances being larger than the true distance, and this error accumulates.
- Compensating error: Incorrect, as the effect of the mud is consistent and systematic, not random.
Therefore, the clogging of chain rings with mud introduces a positive cumulative error.
| Type of Error | Description | Effect on Measurement (Shorter Chain) | Cumulative/Compensating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Cumulative Error | Systematically makes measured distance too large. | Measured distance > True distance | Cumulative |
| Negative Cumulative Error | Systematically makes measured distance too small. | Measured distance < True distance | Cumulative |
| Compensating Error | Randomly positive or negative; tends to cancel out. | Varies; averages towards zero over many trials. | Compensating |
Revision Table: Types of Surveying Errors
| Error Type | Characteristics | Example (affecting chain/tape length) | Effect on Distance Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systematic (Cumulative) | Follows a definite law; sign and magnitude can be determined; accumulates. | Temperature expansion/contraction of tape; sag in tape; chain rings clogged with mud. | Error accumulates over distance; requires correction. Can be positive or negative. |
| Positive Cumulative | Measured distance is systematically too large. | Using a chain/tape that is shorter than its nominal length. | Measured distance > True distance. |
| Negative Cumulative | Measured distance is systematically too small. | Using a chain/tape that is longer than its nominal length. | Measured distance < True distance. |
| Random (Compensating) | Accidental; due to combination of unavoidable causes; cannot be corrected completely; unpredictable sign; tends to cancel out. | Inaccurate marking of chain/tape ends; slight variation in pulling tension or alignment by operator. | Error magnitude is proportional to the square root of the number of measurements; tends to compensate. |
Additional Information: Other Sources of Error in Chaining
Besides mud clogging, several other factors can introduce errors in linear measurements using chains or tapes:
- Incorrect Chain/Tape Length: The chain or tape might not be manufactured to the exact nominal length, or it might change length over time due to wear, repair, or damage. This causes a systematic error.
- Temperature Variation: Chains and tapes expand with increasing temperature and contract with decreasing temperature. If measurements are taken at a temperature different from the standard temperature at which the chain was calibrated, a systematic error is introduced. Steel tapes are particularly sensitive to temperature.
- Sag in Chain/Tape: If the chain or tape is not supported along its entire length (e.g., when chaining across a depression), it will sag. Sag causes the horizontal distance between the ends to be less than the tape reading, introducing a negative cumulative error.
- Incorrect Alignment: If the chain or tape is not held perfectly along the line being measured, the measured distance will be slightly greater than the true distance. This is usually a random error but can be systematic if alignment is consistently off.
- Incorrect Tension: Applying too much or too little tension when measuring with a tape will cause it to stretch or sag differently, introducing errors. This can be systematic if tension is consistently off or random if it varies.
- Improper Marking: Errors can occur when marking the end of the chain or tape on the ground, especially if the marks are not precise points. This is typically a random or compensating error.
- Personal Errors: Mistakes in reading the tape, calling out readings, or recording data are blunders, which are different from errors but can also affect the accuracy.
Understanding these potential errors and their nature (systematic or random, positive or negative) is crucial for accurate surveying work and for applying appropriate corrections.
Important Questions from Accuracy and Errors
An angle measured with theodolite is α with weight 2. The weight of \(\rm \frac{\alpha}{4}\) will be
If the probable error in single observation is ± 0.04 m and that of the mean is ± 0.01 m, then the number of observations are
Errors arising from carelessness of the observer are known as
The errors such as sag in chain and chain not being horizontal during stepping are common in:
The length of a line measured with a 30 m chain is 800.64 m. Afterwards it is found that the chain is 0.05 m too long. The true length of the line is:
