Sita is a twelve year old girl. For many years, she has been asking her parents for a pet dog. Her parents told her that a dog would not be happy in an apartment, but they have given her permission to have a bird. Sita has not yet decided what kind of bird she would like to have. The statement that best supports this paragraph is
Sita stays with her parents in the same apartment.
Understanding the Paragraph About Sita's Pet
The paragraph tells us about Sita, a twelve-year-old girl who wants a pet dog. Her parents say no to a dog because it wouldn't be happy in their living situation. Instead, they allow her to get a bird. Sita is still deciding what kind of bird she wants.
We need to find the statement that is best supported by the information given in this paragraph.
Analyzing the Options
Let's look at each option and see if the paragraph supports it:
- Option 1: Sita's parents like birds more than dogs.
The paragraph doesn't say if the parents like birds more than dogs. It only says a dog isn't suitable for where they live, and they allowed a bird. Their personal preference for one animal over the other is not mentioned.
- Option 2: Sita does not like birds.
The paragraph states that Sita "has not yet decided what kind of bird she would like to have". This suggests she is considering getting a bird and is trying to choose one, which means she likely does like birds or is open to having one.
- Option 3: Sita stays with her parents in the same apartment.
The key reason given by Sita's parents for not getting a dog is that "a dog would not be happy in an apartment". This strongly implies that the family lives in an apartment. Since Sita is a twelve-year-old girl and her parents are making decisions about her pet, it is very likely that she lives with her parents in this same apartment. This statement is directly supported by the context provided.
- Option 4: Sita's parents do not like to keep pets in the apartment.
The paragraph says that Sita's parents "have given her permission to have a bird". A bird is a pet. Since they allowed a bird in the apartment, this statement is contradicted by the text.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the statement that is best supported by the paragraph is that Sita stays with her parents in the same apartment. This is because the parents' reason for denying the dog implies they live in an apartment, and Sita lives with them.
Important Questions from Statements and Inferences
“India is a country of rich heritage and cultural diversity.”
Which one of the following facts best supports the claim made in the above sentence?
Yoga has become a very popular exercise today. But before one joins a yoga class, he/she needs to examine the kind of fitness routine that he/she expects. If one is looking for a high energy, fast-paced aerobic workout, a yoga class might not be the best choice. The statement that best supports this paragraph is
An honest king decided to give death penalty to his minister for some mistake. But he gave him two options: "If you tell correctly what I am thinking now, you will be hanged. But if your guess is wrong, you will be killed by throwing to crocodiles". The clever minister made a statement such that the king could not kill him. The statement made by the minister is
Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.
Statement:
Extensive use of pesticides in agricultural production contaminates soil and water, remain in the crops and finally enter food chain, thereby posing threat to the human beings.
Inference:
I. Excessive use of pesticides in agricultural production is not good for people.
II. Excessive use of pesticides in agricultural production can have a bad effect on water.
In this question, two statements I and II have been given. These statements may be independent causes or effects of independent causes or a common cause. One of the statements may be the effect of the other statement. Read both statements and select the correct answer.
I. Country X reduced their crude oil import by 6% in the last 5 years.
II. The automobile industry in Country X has witnessed a sharp decline of 13% in its growth margin this year.
