The sentence provided is: "The languages that he can speak are English, Hindi, Marathi, and Kannada." We need to examine the underlined segment, "can speak are", and determine if it is grammatically correct in the context of the sentence, or if one of the given options provides a better substitute.
Let's break down the sentence to understand its structure:
The underlined segment combines the verb from the relative clause ("can speak") and the main verb of the sentence ("are"). However, "can speak" is the verb *within* the relative clause, applying to "he" (he can speak languages), while "are" is the main verb applying to "The languages" (The languages are...). The underlined part "can speak are" is not a single grammatical unit where "can speak" modifies "are". It's the end of the relative clause "that he can speak" followed by the main verb "are".
Let's consider the relationship between the subject and the main verb. The subject is "The languages", which is plural. The verb "are" is the correct plural form of the verb "to be" required to agree with the plural subject "The languages".
The relative clause "that he can speak" functions correctly to identify the specific languages. The use of "can speak" indicates the ability or knowledge of speaking these languages, which is appropriate for the context.
So, the structure is essentially:
Subject (The languages [that he can speak]) + Verb (are) + Complement (English, Hindi, Marathi, and Kannada).
The sentence as it stands follows standard English grammar rules for subject-verb agreement and the use of relative clauses.
Let's look at the alternative options provided:
This option is grammatically incorrect. "is speaking" implies a continuous action happening right now, which doesn't fit the context of stating someone's known languages. Also, combining "is speaking" and "are" in this structure makes no sense.
This option changes the main verb from "are" to "is". The subject is "The languages", which is plural. A plural subject requires a plural verb, which is "are", not "is". Therefore, this option introduces an error in subject-verb agreement.
This option changes the verb in the relative clause to "will speak". "will speak" refers to a future action, meaning the languages he *will* speak at some point in the future, not the languages he *can* speak now. This changes the meaning of the sentence and is likely not what was intended. Also, the combination of "will speak" and the main verb "are" is structured correctly (relative clause ending + main verb), but the tense in the relative clause changes the meaning inappropriately.
Based on our analysis, the original sentence "The languages that he can speak are English, Hindi, Marathi, and Kannada" is grammatically sound. The plural subject "The languages" correctly takes the plural verb "are", and the relative clause "that he can speak" accurately describes the languages being referred to.
The original sentence is grammatically correct and appropriately conveys the intended meaning. The plural subject "The languages" correctly agrees with the plural main verb "are". The relative clause "that he can speak" is correctly formed and provides necessary information about the subject. Therefore, no substitution is needed.
| Part of Sentence | Grammatical Role | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| The languages | Main Subject | Plural noun, requires a plural verb. |
| that he can speak | Relative Clause | Modifies "The languages". Subject is "he", verb is "can speak". Describes ability. |
| are | Main Verb | Plural verb, agrees with "The languages". |
| English, Hindi, Marathi, and Kannada | Complement | List of languages, identifies the subject. |
Let's review the key grammatical concepts at play:
A relative clause is a type of subordinate clause that functions like an adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun. It usually begins with a relative pronoun (like who, whom, whose, which, that) or a relative adverb (like where, when, why).
Examples:
In the given sentence, "that he can speak" is a relative clause modifying "The languages". It tells us *which* languages are being discussed.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
My old teacher gave many poor students money in spite of he was poor.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
You should to read the newspaper regularly if you want to be well-informed.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
If he had listening to me he would not have got lost.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”
He asked for a bank loan also he didn't have sufficient resources.
In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the underlined part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select “No improvement”.
I went to the shop to buy some stationeries .