Assertion (A): If a substance loses oxygen during a reaction, it is said to be reduced.
Reason (R): Reduction is defined as the gain of hydrogen or loss of oxygen.
This question requires evaluating two statements about chemical reduction.
The assertion states that a substance losing oxygen during a reaction is reduced. This is a primary definition of reduction in chemistry, often contrasted with oxidation (loss of oxygen). Therefore, Assertion (A) is true.
The reason provides a definition for reduction: "Reduction is defined as the gain of hydrogen or loss of oxygen." This definition accurately encompasses key aspects of reduction processes. Therefore, Reason (R) is also true.
Reason (R) explicitly mentions "loss of oxygen" as part of the definition of reduction. Assertion (A) describes reduction as occurring when a substance "loses oxygen." Since the definition provided in Reason (R) directly supports and explains the phenomenon described in Assertion (A), Reason (R) serves as the correct explanation for Assertion (A).
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true statements, and Reason (R) correctly explains Assertion (A).
Therefore, the correct option is: Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Which one of the following is the correct molecular formula of ammonium carbonate if the valency of ammonium ion is (+1) and carbonate anion is (-2)?
Which one of the following statements is correct?
Which one of the following is the chemical formula of gypsum?
Which one of the following statements about water is not true ?