Assertion [a]: Meteorites are the solid extraterrestrial material that strikes the surface of the earth.
Reason [r]: The most primitive among chondrites are those containing carbon called carbonaeous chondrites and they retain at least some of their volatile elements.
The assertion defines meteorites. Let's break down this definition:
This statement is scientifically accurate. A meteorite is indeed a solid object originating from outer space (extraterrestrial) that survives its fiery passage through Earth's atmosphere and impacts the planet's surface. Examples include fragments from asteroids, comets, or even planets like Mars.
The reason discusses a specific type of meteorite. Let's analyze it:
This statement is also scientifically correct. Carbonaceous chondrites are a group of stony meteorites known for:
Now, we need to determine if the reason explains the assertion.
While both statements are true, the properties of carbonaceous chondrites (like retaining volatile elements) do not serve as the fundamental explanation for why meteorites, in general, are defined as solid extraterrestrial objects that strike Earth. The reason provides details about a specific type, not the core concept presented in the assertion.
Therefore, both statements are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation for the assertion.
The magazine in which Mahatma Gandhi mentioned what he wanted the Constitution to do is:
Which gas shields the surface of the earth from ultraviolet radiation from the sun?
Which event is marked as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO?
Who has been conferred with the rank of the Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2018?
Who directead the film ‘Bhuvan Shome’?