Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some vegetables are nuts.
All fruits are nuts.
Conclusions:
(I) Some vegetables are fruits.
(II) All nuts are fruits.
We need to determine if the given conclusions logically follow from the statements.
Conclusion I: Some vegetables are fruits. ($V \cap F \neq \emptyset$)
From Statement 1 ($V \cap N \neq \emptyset$) and Statement 2 ($F \subseteq N$), we cannot conclude that some vegetables are fruits. The vegetables that are nuts might be completely separate from the fruits (which are also nuts). The statements do not provide enough information to link vegetables directly to fruits.
Conclusion II: All nuts are fruits. ($N \subseteq F$)
Statement 2 states that all fruits are nuts ($F \subseteq N$). This is not the same as saying all nuts are fruits. It is possible for the set of nuts to be larger than the set of fruits, meaning there could be nuts that are not fruits. Therefore, this conclusion does not logically follow.
Since neither Conclusion (I) nor Conclusion II can be logically deduced from the given statements, the correct option is that neither conclusion follows.
Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow the given statements.
Statements :
0% chairs are tables.
All computers are chairs.
Some books are tables.
Conclusions :
I. Not a single table is a computer.
II. Some books are not chairs.
Directions: Study the following Bar-chart and the data provided to answer the questions that follow: Sales of 3-different companies selling T-Shirts for the years from 2006 to 2009 are given. How much percentage of sales decreased for Brand X T-shirt in 2009 compared with 2007?
