Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement. Statement: The importance of a person is not dependent only on one’s status and money. Conclusions: I. The goal of most people is just to acquire more money.
Only conclusion II follows.
Let's carefully analyze the given statement and the conclusions drawn from it to determine which conclusion logically follows.
Analyzing the Statement and Conclusions
The provided statement is:
- The importance of a person is not dependent only on one’s status and money.
The conclusions are:
- The goal of most people is just to acquire more money.
- There are some factors other than status and money which contribute to the importance of a person.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Analyzing Conclusion I
Conclusion I states: The goal of most people is just to acquire more money.
Let's evaluate if this conclusion is supported by the statement. The statement talks about what determines a person's importance. It says importance isn't *only* about status and money. It does not say anything about what people's goals are or what most people strive for. The goals of individuals are a separate topic not addressed by the statement about the factors contributing to a person's importance.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Analyzing Conclusion II
Conclusion II states: There are some factors other than status and money which contribute to the importance of a person.
Let's evaluate if this conclusion is supported by the statement. The statement says, "The importance of a person is not dependent only on one’s status and money." The phrase "not dependent only on X and Y" directly implies that while X and Y might be contributing factors, there must be other factors that also play a role in determining the importance. If importance *only* depended on status and money, the statement would say so. Since it explicitly states it's "not dependent only" on these two, it logically follows that other factors exist and contribute to importance.
Therefore, Conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
Summary of Conclusions
Based on our analysis:
- Conclusion I does not follow as it talks about people's goals, which is unrelated to the statement about factors determining importance.
- Conclusion II logically follows because the statement implies that factors other than status and money are also involved in determining a person's importance.
Hence, only Conclusion II follows from the statement.
Statement and Conclusion Logic
In statement and conclusion questions, the goal is to determine which conclusion(s) can be strictly and logically deduced from the information provided in the statement, without bringing in external knowledge or assumptions.
| Statement Element | Meaning in Context |
|---|---|
| Importance of a person | The value or significance attributed to an individual. |
| Not dependent only on status and money | Status and money are not the sole determinants; other factors also matter. |
Revision Table: Statement and Conclusions
| Component | Analysis | Follows? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Importance isn't SOLELY status/money. | N/A |
| Conclusion I (Goals) | About people's goals (money acquisition). Statement is about importance factors. | No |
| Conclusion II (Other Factors) | About other factors besides status/money contributing to importance. Directly implied by "not dependent ONLY". | Yes |
Additional Information: Logical Reasoning Concepts
Understanding statements and conclusions is fundamental in logical reasoning. Key concepts include:
- Statement: A declarative sentence that is considered true for the purpose of the question.
- Conclusion: A sentence or claim derived from the statement(s).
- Logical Deduction: The process of reasoning from one or more general statements (premises) to reach a logically certain conclusion. In these questions, the statement is the premise.
- Inference: A conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and reasoning. Conclusions in these questions must be direct inferences from the statement alone.
It is crucial to avoid making assumptions or using real-world knowledge that is not explicitly stated or implied by the given statement.
Important Questions from Statements and Conclusions
A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
Situation:
Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.
Conclusions:
I. Even after declining employment, Country K has enough potters to continue contributing equally to the international market.
II. The local demand of pottery in Country K has substantially decreased leading to less interest among potters.
The statement below is followed by three conclusions labelled I, II and III. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the three suggested conclusions logically follows for pursuing.
Statements:
1) No school is an institution but they are establishment.
2) All establishments that are not institutions have buildings.
Conclusions:
I. Schools are not establishments.
II. All schools have buildings.
III. Schools do not have buildings.Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
The Gateway of India is in Mumbai.
Mumbai is in India.
Conclusion:
The Gateway of India is in India.
Read the given statements and conclusion carefully and decide which of the following options is true with respect to the given conclusion.
Statements:
Men who are handsome are generally of the intellectual type.
Vikram is handsome.
Conclusion:
Vikram is intellectual.Given is a statement, followed by four conclusions. Read the statement carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statement.
Statement:
This book can help because all good books help.
Conclusions:
I. This is not a good book.
II. This is a good book.
III. No good book helps.
IV. Some good books help.
