Read the given statement and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement. Statement: The importance of a person is not dependent only on one’s status and money. Conclusions: I. The goal of most people is just to acquire more money.
Only conclusion II follows.
Let's carefully analyze the given statement and the conclusions drawn from it to determine which conclusion logically follows.
The provided statement is:
The conclusions are:
Conclusion I states: The goal of most people is just to acquire more money.
Let's evaluate if this conclusion is supported by the statement. The statement talks about what determines a person's importance. It says importance isn't *only* about status and money. It does not say anything about what people's goals are or what most people strive for. The goals of individuals are a separate topic not addressed by the statement about the factors contributing to a person's importance.
Therefore, Conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Conclusion II states: There are some factors other than status and money which contribute to the importance of a person.
Let's evaluate if this conclusion is supported by the statement. The statement says, "The importance of a person is not dependent only on one’s status and money." The phrase "not dependent only on X and Y" directly implies that while X and Y might be contributing factors, there must be other factors that also play a role in determining the importance. If importance *only* depended on status and money, the statement would say so. Since it explicitly states it's "not dependent only" on these two, it logically follows that other factors exist and contribute to importance.
Therefore, Conclusion II logically follows from the given statement.
Based on our analysis:
Hence, only Conclusion II follows from the statement.
In statement and conclusion questions, the goal is to determine which conclusion(s) can be strictly and logically deduced from the information provided in the statement, without bringing in external knowledge or assumptions.
| Statement Element | Meaning in Context |
|---|---|
| Importance of a person | The value or significance attributed to an individual. |
| Not dependent only on status and money | Status and money are not the sole determinants; other factors also matter. |
| Component | Analysis | Follows? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | Importance isn't SOLELY status/money. | N/A |
| Conclusion I (Goals) | About people's goals (money acquisition). Statement is about importance factors. | No |
| Conclusion II (Other Factors) | About other factors besides status/money contributing to importance. Directly implied by "not dependent ONLY". | Yes |
Understanding statements and conclusions is fundamental in logical reasoning. Key concepts include:
It is crucial to avoid making assumptions or using real-world knowledge that is not explicitly stated or implied by the given statement.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. All A are B.
II. Some B are C.
Conclusions:
I. Some A are C.
II. Some A are not C.
III. Some A are B.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statement:
A asked C, "What time is it now?" Is it half past two? ''
Conclusions:
1. A wants to go to lunch.
2. A wants to confirm what the time is because his watch is off.
In the question one statement is given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement : 55% of Manisha's office colleagues went to watch the movie.
Conclusion I : Manisha went to watch the movie.
Conclusion II : Manisha did not go to watch the movie.
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement 1 : All schools are books.
Statement 2 : No books are papers.
Conclusion I : No schools are books.
Conclusion II : Some books are schools.
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be different from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some P are Q.
II. All P are N.
Conclusion:
I. All Q are N.
II. Some P are not Q.