Code of Conduct: Assertion and Reason Analysis

This section evaluates the given Assertion (A) and Reason (R) concerning the nature of a code of conduct and its constitutional basis.

Analysis of Assertion (A): Code of Conduct's Force

Assertion (A): Code of conduct has statutory force.

• A statutory force implies that a code is established by a specific law passed by a legislature.
• Codes of conduct, often related to ethical guidelines or professional standards, derive their authority from the rules or bodies that establish them (e.g., professional organizations, internal policies).
• While some conduct rules might be codified in law, a general statement that all codes of conduct possess inherent statutory force is typically inaccurate.

Therefore, Assertion (A) is considered incorrect.

Analysis of Reason (R): Constitutional Reference

Reason (R): Because Article 102 of the Constitution says so.

• Article 102 of the Indian Constitution addresses the grounds for disqualification of members of Parliament.
• These grounds include holding an office of profit, being of unsound mind, insolvency, or disqualification under laws made by Parliament.
• Article 102 does not mention or establish that codes of conduct have statutory force.

Therefore, Reason (R) is factually incorrect.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis:

• Assertion (A) is incorrect as codes of conduct do not inherently possess statutory force.
• Reason (R) is incorrect because Article 102 of the Constitution does not support the claim made in the assertion.

Consequently, the option stating that both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are wrong is the correct choice.