All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using code below :
Assertion (A) : Where a bill is unintentionally cancelled by the holder or his agent and the cancellation is not apparent thereon, the bill is discharged.
Reason (R) : Above principle is laid down in Section 82 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Code :

The correct answer is
Both (A) and (R) are wrong

This question requires evaluating an Assertion (A) and a Reason (R) concerning the discharge of a bill under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Analysis of Assertion (A)

Assertion (A) states that if a bill is unintentionally cancelled by the holder or agent and the cancellation isn't apparent, the bill is discharged.

  • Generally, for cancellation to discharge a bill, it must be done intentionally by the holder.
  • Furthermore, the cancellation must typically be apparent on the face of the bill.
  • An unintentional cancellation that is also not apparent would not meet the criteria for discharging the bill.

Therefore, Assertion (A) is incorrect.

Analysis of Reason (R)

Reason (R) claims the principle in Assertion (A) is laid down in Section 82 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

  • Section 82 of the Negotiable Instruments Act deals with circumstances under which parties are discharged from liability.
  • Specifically, Section 82(1)(c) allows for discharge if the bill is intentionally cancelled by the holder.
  • Since Assertion (A) describes an unintentional cancellation, it contradicts the requirement for intentionality stated in Section 82.

Therefore, Reason (R) is incorrect because it misattributes the flawed principle in Assertion (A) to Section 82.

Conclusion

As both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are found to be incorrect based on the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the correct option is that both are wrong.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Negotiable instrument Act, 1881

  1. Which of the following is not true in the context of a promissory note?
  2. Which of the following is not a negotiable instrument?
  3. Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Read the statements and choose the correct answer using the code given below.
    Assertion (A) : A 'negotiable instrument' means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer.
    Reason (R) : Because it is said so under Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
  4. Which one of the following statements is true ?
  5. Match List – I with List – II and select the correct answer using the codes given below :
    List – IList – II
    i. Inchoate stamped instrumenta. Union Bank of India Vs. Ankur Corp.
    ii. Liability of acceptor of a negotiable instrumentb. Section 31 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
    iii. Liability of an endorserc. Section 35 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
    iv. Liability of the drawee of a cheque.d. Section 20 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.

    Codes :
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App