RBI The sale of a bond by the United States to individuals or institutions results in a ______. I. Shortage of stock II. Shortage in money supply
The question asks about the effects of the United States selling bonds to individuals or institutions, specifically regarding a potential "shortage of stock" and a "shortage in money supply". Let's break down each statement based on standard economic principles.
When the United States government sells bonds, it is essentially borrowing money from the buyers (individuals or institutions). In exchange for the bond, the buyers give the government money.
Statement I suggests a "shortage of stock". The term "stock" usually refers to shares of ownership in a company (equity). Bonds, on the other hand, are debt instruments, representing a loan made by the buyer to the issuer (in this case, the US government). Selling government bonds has no direct impact on the availability or quantity of company stocks traded in the stock market. Therefore, a shortage of stock is not a consequence of the United States selling bonds.
Statement II suggests a "shortage in money supply". When individuals or institutions buy bonds from the US government, they pay the government with money. This money is transferred from the private sector (individuals, banks, companies) to the government. Unless the government immediately spends this money back into the economy, this transaction effectively removes money from circulation in the broader economy. This action typically leads to a decrease or contraction in the money supply held by the public and institutions.
However, the statement uses the term "shortage" in money supply. While the money supply decreases, the term "shortage" might imply a severe or undesirable lack of money, which isn't the guaranteed or primary description of this effect. Government bond sales are a tool often used for fiscal financing or sometimes in coordination with monetary policy (though direct treasury sales are fiscal). The effect is a reduction in liquidity or money supply held by the public, but "shortage" might be considered an imprecise or incorrect term in this general context. Standard economic texts describe this as a contraction or decrease in money supply, not necessarily a "shortage".
Considering the provided correct answer indicates that neither statement is correct, the interpretation must be that Statement I is factually incorrect (bond sales don't affect stock availability) and Statement II, while describing an action that reduces money supply, uses the term "shortage" which is deemed incorrect or inappropriate for this specific effect.
Therefore, based on the analysis and the provided options, neither statement I nor statement II correctly describes the direct and standard consequences of the United States selling bonds to individuals or institutions.
This leads to the conclusion that neither I nor II is a correct result of the US selling bonds.
| Term | Definition/Effect |
|---|---|
| Bonds | Debt instruments; represent a loan to the issuer. |
| Stocks | Equity instruments; represent ownership in a company. |
| Selling Government Bonds | Government borrows money; takes money out of circulation from buyers. |
| Money Supply | Total amount of money circulating in an economy. |
When the U.S. Treasury sells bonds to the public, it is primarily a fiscal operation to finance government spending or manage debt. The immediate effect is that the buyers' bank accounts decrease (money goes to the Treasury), and thus the amount of money available to be spent or lent in the private sector is reduced. This is often referred to as a reduction in the money supply or a drain on liquidity.
In the context of monetary policy, central banks (like the Federal Reserve in the US, not RBI as mentioned in the question which is India's central bank) conduct 'open market operations' which involve buying and selling government securities. When a central bank sells bonds, it also reduces the money supply in the banking system, which can influence interest rates and lending. While the question mentions RBI and US together, the action is described as the US selling bonds, which typically refers to Treasury sales for financing purposes. The impact on money supply (reduction) is similar whether the seller is the Treasury or the Central Bank, though the primary objective and specific mechanisms within the banking system can differ.
The term "shortage" implies an insufficient amount relative to need or demand. While money supply decreases, whether this constitutes a "shortage" depends heavily on economic conditions and context, and it is not the standard term used to describe the immediate, mechanical effect of bond sales.
Savings is that portion of money income that is .....
The persistent and appreciable full in level of prices and when the rate of change of price index is negative it is called as
While computing Net Economic Welfare (NEW), which of the following items is subtracted from GNP?
Which of the following statements are CORRECT for welfare economics?
A. Any competitive equilibrium leads to a Pareto efficient allocation of resources
B. Competitive equilibrium does not lead to Pareto efficient allocation of resources
C. Any efficient allocation can be attained by a competitive equilibrium given the market mechanism leading to redistribution
D. There will be no Pareto efficient allocation of resources in the society
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The Scarcity Definition of Economics has been given by