R2D2 is a robot. R2D2 can repair aeroplanes. No other robot can repair aeroplanes.
R2D2 is the only robot which can repair aeroplanes.
Analyze R2D2 Robot Repair Aeroplanes Logical Inference
This question involves analyzing a set of statements to determine the correct logical inference. Let's break down the given information:
- Statement 1: R2D2 is a robot.
- Statement 2: R2D2 can repair aeroplanes.
- Statement 3: No other robot can repair aeroplanes.
We need to find the conclusion that logically follows from these three statements.
Evaluating the Options
Let's examine each option to see if it can be directly inferred:
Option 1: R2D2 is a robot which can only repair aeroplanes.
This statement implies that R2D2 is limited to *only* repairing aeroplanes and cannot perform any other tasks. The given statements tell us what R2D2 *can* do (repair aeroplanes) and what other robots *cannot* do, but they do not restrict R2D2's capabilities to just aeroplane repair. Therefore, this inference is not necessarily true.
Option 2: R2D2 is the only robot which can repair aeroplanes.
This statement combines Statement 2 ("R2D2 can repair aeroplanes") and Statement 3 ("No other robot can repair aeroplanes"). If R2D2 possesses the ability to repair aeroplanes, and all other robots lack this specific ability, then it logically follows that R2D2 is the unique robot capable of repairing aeroplanes. This statement is a direct and valid inference.
Option 3: R2D2 is a robot which can repair only aeroplanes.
Similar to Option 1, this statement places a restriction on R2D2's abilities, suggesting aeroplane repair is its sole function. The provided statements do not give us information about R2D2's other potential functions or limitations. Thus, we cannot infer this specific restriction.
Option 4: Only R2D2 is a robot.
Statement 1 confirms R2D2 is a robot. Statement 3 says "No *other* robot can repair aeroplanes," which implies the existence of potentially other robots, but specifies their inability to repair aeroplanes. It does not state that R2D2 is the *only* robot in existence. Therefore, this inference is incorrect.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the only statement that can be logically inferred directly from the given premises is that R2D2 holds the exclusive ability among robots to repair aeroplanes.
Important Questions from Critical Reasoning
Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.
Statement: Many students are addicted to mobile games and this leads to poor academic performance.
Inference:
I. Many Students are not paying attention to studies due to mobile games.
II. It is only because of mobile games that students fail in the examination.
'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:
It is better to spend the leftovers after saving. Financial discipline and self-control can make you rich. Saving money after spending is not a good habit. Which among the following statements is true as per the statement?
A. If you spend first then you will be spendy.
B. If you save before spending, you will become rich.
C. If you spend before saving, you will be poor.
D. Saving by borrowing is a bad habit.
Which of the following is the assumption for the claim that 'Pleasure is desirable'?
Read the given statements carefully and answer the questions.
Fear of danger is more dangerous than danger itself. Risk is directly proportional= to danger
Which of the following are true according to the given statements?
A. Fear is worse than any fearful threat.
B. There is a trade-off between risk and danger.
C. There should be fear of danger.
D. There is no need to take risks to overcome any danger.
