R2D2 is a robot. R2D2 can repair aeroplanes. No other robot can repair aeroplanes.
R2D2 is the only robot which can repair aeroplanes.
This question involves analyzing a set of statements to determine the correct logical inference. Let's break down the given information:
We need to find the conclusion that logically follows from these three statements.
Let's examine each option to see if it can be directly inferred:
This statement implies that R2D2 is limited to *only* repairing aeroplanes and cannot perform any other tasks. The given statements tell us what R2D2 *can* do (repair aeroplanes) and what other robots *cannot* do, but they do not restrict R2D2's capabilities to just aeroplane repair. Therefore, this inference is not necessarily true.
This statement combines Statement 2 ("R2D2 can repair aeroplanes") and Statement 3 ("No other robot can repair aeroplanes"). If R2D2 possesses the ability to repair aeroplanes, and all other robots lack this specific ability, then it logically follows that R2D2 is the unique robot capable of repairing aeroplanes. This statement is a direct and valid inference.
Similar to Option 1, this statement places a restriction on R2D2's abilities, suggesting aeroplane repair is its sole function. The provided statements do not give us information about R2D2's other potential functions or limitations. Thus, we cannot infer this specific restriction.
Statement 1 confirms R2D2 is a robot. Statement 3 says "No *other* robot can repair aeroplanes," which implies the existence of potentially other robots, but specifies their inability to repair aeroplanes. It does not state that R2D2 is the *only* robot in existence. Therefore, this inference is incorrect.
Based on the analysis, the only statement that can be logically inferred directly from the given premises is that R2D2 holds the exclusive ability among robots to repair aeroplanes.
As a responsible person, which of the following is not advisable?
Given question has main statement followed by four statements. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement.
When she takes an examination, she clears it.
A. she took an examination
B. she did not take an examination
C. she cleared it.
D. she did not clear it.
You are alone in your house and there is a danger of thieves around. You hear a knock on the door. What should be your most logical action?
While traveling in a train, you notice that a lady from the coach behind you falls from the stairs of the train. What should be your best rational course of action?