All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

R2D2 is a robot. R2D2 can repair aeroplanes. No other robot can repair aeroplanes.

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above statements?

The correct answer is

R2D2 is the only robot which can repair aeroplanes.

Analyze R2D2 Robot Repair Aeroplanes Logical Inference

This question involves analyzing a set of statements to determine the correct logical inference. Let's break down the given information:

  • Statement 1: R2D2 is a robot.
  • Statement 2: R2D2 can repair aeroplanes.
  • Statement 3: No other robot can repair aeroplanes.

We need to find the conclusion that logically follows from these three statements.

Evaluating the Options

Let's examine each option to see if it can be directly inferred:

Option 1: R2D2 is a robot which can only repair aeroplanes.

This statement implies that R2D2 is limited to *only* repairing aeroplanes and cannot perform any other tasks. The given statements tell us what R2D2 *can* do (repair aeroplanes) and what other robots *cannot* do, but they do not restrict R2D2's capabilities to just aeroplane repair. Therefore, this inference is not necessarily true.

Option 2: R2D2 is the only robot which can repair aeroplanes.

This statement combines Statement 2 ("R2D2 can repair aeroplanes") and Statement 3 ("No other robot can repair aeroplanes"). If R2D2 possesses the ability to repair aeroplanes, and all other robots lack this specific ability, then it logically follows that R2D2 is the unique robot capable of repairing aeroplanes. This statement is a direct and valid inference.

Option 3: R2D2 is a robot which can repair only aeroplanes.

Similar to Option 1, this statement places a restriction on R2D2's abilities, suggesting aeroplane repair is its sole function. The provided statements do not give us information about R2D2's other potential functions or limitations. Thus, we cannot infer this specific restriction.

Option 4: Only R2D2 is a robot.

Statement 1 confirms R2D2 is a robot. Statement 3 says "No *other* robot can repair aeroplanes," which implies the existence of potentially other robots, but specifies their inability to repair aeroplanes. It does not state that R2D2 is the *only* robot in existence. Therefore, this inference is incorrect.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, the only statement that can be logically inferred directly from the given premises is that R2D2 holds the exclusive ability among robots to repair aeroplanes.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Critical Reasoning

  1. 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:

  2. Which of the following is the assumption for the claim that 'Pleasure is desirable'?

  3. Read the given statements carefully and answer the questions.

    Fear of danger is more dangerous than danger itself. Risk is directly proportional= to danger

    Which of the following are true according to the given statements?

    A. Fear is worse than any fearful threat.

    B. There is a trade-off between risk and danger.

    C. There should be fear of danger.

    D. There is no need to take risks to overcome any danger.

  4. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of user names and email ids of some users without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: The company has not told the fixed number of people affected by data violation. Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

  5. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of the user name and email id of some of its users, without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: Amazon has not instructed its supervisors to not provide any comments or offers of compensation to the affected users.

    Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App