Provisions of the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 does not apply in respect of tax arrears relating to which one of the following ?
an assessment year in respect of which prosecution has been instituted on or before the date of filing of declaration
The Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (VsV Act) was introduced by the Government of India to resolve pending income tax disputes efficiently. The primary objective was to reduce litigation and provide a mechanism for taxpayers to settle their direct tax disputes by paying a specified percentage of the disputed tax, interest, and penalty.
While the Act covered a wide range of disputes related to income tax, wealth tax, etc., there were specific categories of tax arrears and disputes that were excluded from its purview. It is important to understand these exclusions to determine where the Act's provisions do not apply.
Section 9 of the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 lists the cases and circumstances where the scheme does not apply. Some of the key exclusions typically include:
Let's examine each option in the context of the VsV Act's exclusions regarding tax arrears:
Option 1: an assessment year in respect of which prosecution has been instituted on or before the date of filing of declaration
This option directly reflects a common exclusion clause found in the VsV Act. If the tax authorities have already initiated prosecution proceedings against the taxpayer for a specific assessment year before the taxpayer files a declaration under the VsV Act, the tax arrears related to that assessment year are typically not eligible for settlement under the Act. This is because such cases are considered more serious and beyond the scope of a simple dispute resolution scheme.
Option 2: any income from agricultural land in India
Income from agricultural land in India is generally exempt from income tax under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, disputes can arise regarding whether certain income actually qualifies as agricultural income or how it was treated in an assessment, leading to a tax arrear. The VsV Act aimed to resolve disputes related to income tax assessments. If a tax arrear arose from a dispute about agricultural income (e.g., the assessing officer treated it as non-agricultural), the dispute itself could potentially be covered under VsV, provided it wasn't excluded on other grounds (like prosecution). The nature of the income (agricultural) doesn't, by itself, exclude the tax arrear dispute from the VsV Act.
Option 3: Section 10(3) dealing with tax deductions
Section 10 of the Income Tax Act deals with incomes that are exempt from tax. Section 10(3) specifically refers to commutation of pension. Disputes often arise regarding the eligibility or calculation of various exemptions or deductions claimed by taxpayers, leading to tax demands and arrears. The VsV Act was designed precisely to cover such disputes arising from assessments where deductions or exemptions were disallowed, resulting in tax arrears. Therefore, tax arrears arising from disputes concerning Section 10(3) or other parts of Section 10 are generally covered by the VsV Act, not excluded.
Option 4: assessments under Section 80 Gl of the Act
Assuming "Section 80 Gl" is a typo and refers to sections like Section 80-IC or similar deduction provisions for undertakings in specific areas, disputes related to deductions claimed under Chapter VI-A (which includes Section 80C to 80U) or specific sections like 80-IC are very common causes of tax disputes. If an assessing officer disallows a deduction claimed under such sections, it leads to an increased tax demand and thus, tax arrears. Resolving such disputes was a core purpose of the VsV Act. Therefore, tax arrears arising from assessments under such sections are generally eligible for settlement under the VsV Act, not excluded.
Based on the analysis of the exclusions provided in the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, the provision that specifically excludes certain tax arrears relates to cases where prosecution has already been initiated.
The tax arrears relating to an assessment year in respect of which prosecution has been instituted on or before the date of filing of declaration do not apply for settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Therefore, the correct answer is the one stating the exclusion related to prosecution.
| Scenario | Covered by VsV Act? | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Tax arrears where prosecution instituted | No | Specifically excluded by the Act's provisions. |
| Dispute on agricultural income treatment leading to arrear | Yes (Generally) | Dispute type could be covered if no other exclusion applies. |
| Dispute on Section 10 exemption leading to arrear | Yes (Generally) | Disputes over exemptions/deductions are covered. |
| Dispute on Section 80 deduction leading to arrear | Yes (Generally) | Disputes over exemptions/deductions are covered. |
The Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 provided a time-bound opportunity for taxpayers to settle their long-pending tax disputes with the Income Tax Department. By settling under the scheme, taxpayers could get waiver from interest and penalty related to the disputed amount, and the litigation would be withdrawn. The scheme aimed to clear the backlog of direct tax cases across various appellate forums, including Commissioner (Appeals), ITAT, High Courts, and the Supreme Court.
Key benefits for taxpayers opting for the scheme included certainty of tax liability, waiver of interest and penalty, and immunity from prosecution. The amount payable depended on whether the dispute was related to disputed tax, disputed interest, disputed penalty, or disputed fee, and also on the timing of the payment within the scheme's validity period.
Understanding the specific exclusions was crucial for taxpayers to determine their eligibility before making a declaration under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Read the given figure and find the region representing persons who are educated and employed but not confirmed in job.

The magazine in which Mahatma Gandhi mentioned what he wanted the Constitution to do is:
Which gas shields the surface of the earth from ultraviolet radiation from the sun?
Which event is marked as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO?
Who has been conferred with the rank of the Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2018?