Out of the given options, choose the most appropriate one to fill in the blank. Earlier people did not know that food _______ cooked.
could be
Understanding the Sentence Structure
The sentence "Earlier people did not know that food _______ cooked" describes a past lack of knowledge. The subject is "food," and the action is "cooked." Since food doesn't perform the action of cooking itself, the sentence requires a passive construction.
The blank needs a phrase that completes the thought, indicating what people didn't know was possible regarding food and cooking in the past.
Analyzing the Options
We need to choose the option that forms a grammatically correct and contextually appropriate phrase to fill the blank, keeping in mind the need for a passive structure indicating past possibility.
- Option 1: could be
- Option 2: must
- Option 3: could
- Option 4: can have
Evaluating Option 1: could be
When we use "could be" followed by a past participle ("cooked"), it forms the passive voice with the modal verb "could". "Could" is used here to express possibility in the past. "Food could be cooked" means it was possible for food to be cooked. This perfectly fits the context of people being unaware of this possibility in earlier times.
Evaluating Option 2: must
The phrase "must cooked" is grammatically incorrect. "Must" requires a base verb after it (e.g., must cook, must be). Even if it were "must be cooked", "must" implies necessity or strong obligation ("Food must be cooked" means it is necessary to cook food), which doesn't align with the idea of people not knowing about it as a possibility.
Evaluating Option 3: could
The phrase "could cooked" is grammatically incorrect. "Could" requires a base verb after it (e.g., could cook). While "could" indicates past possibility, it doesn't correctly form the passive voice needed here. "Food could cook" would incorrectly imply food cooking itself.
Evaluating Option 4: can have
The phrase "can have cooked" is grammatically incorrect in this passive context. "Can have" followed by a past participle often relates to possibility or a completed action (e.g., "He can have finished the work"). It doesn't fit the required passive structure where food is the recipient of the action, nor does "can have cooked" make sense grammatically for "food" as the subject in this way.
Determining the Correct Fill-in-the-Blank
Considering the need for a past possibility expressed in the passive voice, "could be cooked" is the only option that correctly fits the grammatical structure and the meaning of the sentence. People in the past were unaware that it was possible for food to undergo the process of being cooked.
Conclusion on Food and Cooking Knowledge
The sentence "Earlier people did not know that food could be cooked" correctly uses the passive voice ("be cooked") with the modal verb "could" to express a possibility that was unknown in the past. This makes "could be" the most appropriate choice to fill in the blank.
Important Questions from English Grammar
Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution required’.
Overexposure to the sun while sunbathing not only results in sunburns but also causes premature aging.
The following sentence has a blank space and four words given after the sentence. Select whichever word you consider most appropriate for the blank space. "The doctor said that a small daily ______ of the new drug would soon cure him.
- Choose the most appropriate alternative from the options given below to complete the following sentence:
If the tired soldier wanted to lie down, he _______ the mattress out on the balcony. Select the most appropriate phrasal verb to fill in the blank.
The company’s profits were low and they were forced to __________ staff.
An apple costs Rs. 10. An onion costs Rs. 8.
Select the most suitable sentence with respect to grammar and usage.
